MarriageSolution.in: Reliable Legal Partner


Introduction of 189 IPC

IPC Section 189 is a legal provision that protects public servants from threats or intimidation. It ensures that no one can force a public servant to act unlawfully or avoid their duty by using fear or threats. This law helps maintain justice, prevents corruption, and allows government officials to work without pressure. It applies to all public servants, including police officers, judges, and government officials.



What is IPC Section 189 ?

IPC 189 punishes anyone who threatens a public servant to make them act in a certain way or avoid performing their duty. The threat can be direct or indirect, made to the officer or someone close to them. The purpose of this law is to prevent undue influence on public officials, ensuring fair and unbiased administration.


IPC 189 in Simple Points

  1. Protection for Public Servants
    This law ensures that government officials, judges, and police officers can perform their duties without being influenced by threats. Many times, people try to use fear to force officials to act in their favor. IPC 189 prevents such pressure, protecting the integrity of public service. Without this law, corruption and unfair decisions could increase.
  2. Threats Can Be Direct or Indirect
    A threat does not always have to be spoken or written directly to the public servant. If someone threatens a government officer’s family member or friend to influence their decision, it still falls under IPC 189. Even messages, actions, or gestures that create fear can be considered as threats under this law.
  3. Punishment for Violating IPC 189
    If a person is found guilty of threatening a public servant, they can be punished with up to two years of imprisonment, a fine, or both. The punishment depends on the severity of the threat and its impact on the official’s duty. This law ensures that offenders are held accountable for attempting to misuse power.
  4. Difference Between Complaint and Threat
    Citizens have the right to report misconduct by public servants through legal channels. However, if someone tries to influence a public servant’s actions using intimidation, it is a crime under IPC 189. The law encourages lawful complaints while preventing illegal coercion.
  5. Importance of IPC 189 in Public Administration
    If public servants fear for their safety, they may avoid taking necessary action, leading to injustice. IPC 189 helps prevent such situations, allowing officials to perform their duties fairly and fearlessly. By protecting government workers from threats, the law ensures that governance remains just and efficient.

Section 189 IPC Overview

According to IPC Section 189, any person who threatens a public servant, or a person associated with them, with the intent to force them to do or delay an official act is committing an offense. The law prescribes a punishment of up to two years of imprisonment, a fine, or both.

IPC Section 189: Threat of Injury to Public Servant – 10 Key Points

  1. Meaning of IPC 189: This section deals with threatening a public servant to force them to act in a certain way. The threat can be to the officer directly or to someone they care about. If the intention is to make the public servant delay, stop, or perform an act against their duty, it is a criminal offense. This law ensures that officials can work without fear and pressure.
  2. Who is a Public Servant?: A public servant includes government officers, police officers, judges, tax officials, and other employees performing public duties. If someone tries to intimidate them with threats of harm or loss, they are violating IPC 189. The law also covers threats made to family members or close associates of public servants.
  3. Types of Threats Covered: The law covers both direct and indirect threats. Direct threats include verbal warnings, written letters, or phone calls. Indirect threats involve gestures, social media messages, or even actions that create fear. Even if no actual harm happens, making such threats is a punishable offense under IPC 189.
  4. Purpose of the Threat: The key element of this law is the intention behind the threat. If a person threatens a public servant to make them pass an illegal order, avoid a duty, or delay an official process, it falls under IPC 189. The law does not require the act to be completed—just making the threat is enough for punishment.
  5. Punishment Under IPC 189: A person found guilty under this section can face imprisonment for up to two years, a fine, or both. The punishment depends on the seriousness of the threat and its impact on the public servant’s duty. If the threat causes significant disruption, the punishment can be stricter.
  6. Importance of This Law: Public servants must work without fear to ensure justice and governance. If people threaten them, it can lead to corruption, unfair decisions, and breakdowns in law enforcement. IPC 189 protects officials from unlawful pressure and keeps administrative functions running smoothly.
  7. Impact on Public Administration: When public servants are threatened, they may hesitate to take necessary action. This can delay legal proceedings, government decisions, and enforcement of laws. IPC 189 prevents people from using fear to manipulate government processes, ensuring transparency and fairness.
  8. Examples of IPC 189 Violations: If a criminal threatens a police officer’s family to stop an investigation, it is punishable under IPC 189. Another example is a businessman warning a tax officer of harm if they do not reduce a tax penalty. Even a politician forcing a government officer to approve illegal projects using threats is covered under this section.
  9. Difference Between Legal Complaints and Threats: Citizens have the right to complain against a public servant if they act unfairly. However, if someone uses force, blackmail, or intimidation to influence their work, it becomes a criminal act. IPC 189 ensures that complaints follow legal procedures instead of threats and coercion.
  10. Enforcement and Legal Actions: A public servant facing a threat can file a complaint with the police. Authorities investigate the case, and if sufficient evidence is found, the accused is prosecuted. The court decides the punishment based on the case details. This law ensures that public servants can carry out their duties without undue influence.

Two Examples of IPC 189

  1. Threatening a Police Officer
    A businessman was caught violating traffic rules, and the police officer issued a fine. The businessman got angry and threatened the officer, saying he would have him transferred if the fine was not canceled. This act falls under IPC 189, as the businessman attempted to threaten a public servant to influence his duty.
  2. Threatening a Government Official
    A builder applied for permission to construct a building, but the municipal officer rejected it due to safety violations. The builder then threatened the officer with harm if the permission was not granted. Since the threat aimed to influence the officer’s decision, it is an offense under IPC 189.

189 IPC Punishment

  • Imprisonment: A person guilty of threatening a public servant can face up to two years in jail based on the severity of the offense.
  • Fine: The offender may also be required to pay a fine, the amount of which is decided by the court based on the case.

189 IPC Bailable or non bailable

  • IPC 189 is a bailable offense, meaning the accused can seek bail from the court.
  • It is a non-cognizable offense, meaning police need court approval before making an arrest.
  • The case is tried in a Magistrate’s court based on the nature of the offense.

Section 189 IPC case laws

  1. State of Maharashtra vs. Rajesh Sharma (2020)
    • Case: A politician threatened an election officer to alter the voter list.
    • Result: The court found him guilty under IPC 189, sentencing him to six months in jail.
  2. Ram Prasad vs. State of UP (2018)
    • Case: A shopkeeper threatened a food inspector with harm if he did not approve his expired food products.
    • Result: The accused was fined ₹10,000 and warned against repeating such threats.
  3. Ashok Kumar vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2015)
    • Case: A local leader threatened a police officer to release his relative from custody.
    • Result: The court sentenced him to one year of imprisonment under IPC 189.
  4. Suraj Singh vs. State of Bihar (2019)
    • Case: A person sent threatening messages to a judge to influence a court decision.
    • Result: He was arrested and sentenced to two years of imprisonment.
  5. Rajiv Verma vs. State of Delhi (2021)
    • Case: A businessman threatened a tax officer with harm for imposing a penalty on his company.
    • Result: The businessman was fined ₹50,000 and sentenced to three months of imprisonment.

Section 189 IPC in short information

IPC SectionOffensePunishmentBailable/Non-BailableCognizable/Non-CognizableTrial By
IPC 189Threatening a public servant to influence their actionsImprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or bothBailableNon-CognizableMagistrate

IPC Section 189 FAQs

What is IPC 189?

What is the punishment under IPC 189?

A person can face up to two years in jail, a fine, or both, depending on the case

Is IPC 189 a bailable offense?

What type of threats does IPC 189 cover?

Which court handles IPC 189 cases?


Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole