Introduction to Section 389 BNSS
Section 389 BNSS is a legal provision aimed at ensuring that witnesses follow the orders of the court. When a witness receives a lawful summons to appear before a Criminal Court but fails to attend without a valid reason, this section allows the court to take quick action. It enables the court to try such non-appearance cases summarily. This helps in maintaining the continuity and speed of court proceedings. The provision reflects the seriousness of legal obligations placed on witnesses. It supports timely justice by discouraging unnecessary delays. BNSS 389 ensures courts retain authority in managing legal appearances efficiently.
Table of Contents
What is BNSS Section 389?
BNSS Section 389 allows a Criminal Court to punish a witness who fails to appear in court despite being legally summoned. If the court finds no valid excuse for the absence, it may impose a fine up to ₹500 through a summary trial. The section ensures witnesses take their court duties seriously. It helps prevent unnecessary delays in justice due to absenteeism.

BNSS Section of 389 in Simple Points
1. Applicability to Witnesses
BNSS 389 applies when a witness disobeys a legal summons issued by a Criminal Court. The provision is specific to those who are legally bound to appear in court but fail to do so without a just or lawful excuse. It ensures that individuals summoned as witnesses are held accountable. Without such a safeguard, judicial proceedings could be disrupted. This section upholds the integrity of the justice process. By addressing disobedience, it supports efficient trial conduct. The court can directly take action under this section.
2. Summary Trial Procedure
The court is empowered to conduct a summary trial against the non-compliant witness. Summary trials are designed for speed and efficiency while maintaining fairness. The judge follows simplified procedures, typically without framing formal charges. However, the accused must be given a chance to explain their absence. Only if the excuse is invalid will the penalty be imposed. This allows courts to act promptly and deter misuse of summons. It balances fairness and urgency in justice.
3. Penalty Imposed
If the explanation is found unsatisfactory, the court may impose a fine not exceeding ₹500. There is no imprisonment under this section. The penalty acts as a monetary deterrent to avoid repetition of such behavior. It is modest yet effective in discouraging willful disobedience. The penalty ensures that witnesses respect court authority. It also shows the legal system values the time and process of the judiciary. A repeat violation may lead to stronger legal consequences.
4. Witness’s Right to Be Heard
Before the punishment is declared, the witness is given a fair opportunity to explain their absence. This complies with principles of natural justice, ensuring that no one is punished unheard. The court may excuse the absence if there is a valid reason like illness, accident, or an emergency. This ensures justice is not mechanical but considerate. It prevents unjust punishment and fosters trust in the judicial system. The section encourages honest engagement with legal obligations.
5. Purpose and Impact
BNSS 389 is meant to keep court proceedings on track by ensuring the presence of essential witnesses. Delays caused by absent witnesses often result in postponements and loss of judicial time. This section minimizes those disruptions by holding witnesses legally responsible. It indirectly protects the rights of both the accused and the victim by promoting a timely trial. Thus, it plays a crucial role in speedy justice delivery. BNSS 389 is a preventive and corrective tool in the justice system.
389 BNSS Overview
BNSS 389 outlines the summary procedure for dealing with cases where a witness disobeys a summons issued by a Criminal Court. The law permits the court to impose a fine, after giving the witness a chance to explain. If the court finds no justified excuse, the fine may go up to ₹500. The procedure followed must be similar to that of a summary trial to ensure fairness. It empowers the court to act swiftly and prevent disruptions in proceedings. This section is essential for reducing pendency caused by witness-related delays. The provision strengthens accountability in the justice delivery system.
BNSS Section 389 – Explained in 10 Key Points
1. Introduction to BNSS Section 389
BNSS Section 389 deals with situations where a witness, after receiving a valid summons from a Criminal Court, fails to appear without a valid reason. The section empowers the court to take summary action against such non-compliance. It ensures that the judicial process isn’t delayed due to the irresponsible conduct of summoned individuals. This provision is preventive in nature and aims to maintain the discipline and dignity of the court. When a person disrespects a lawful court order, the justice system needs a way to respond swiftly. Section 389 offers a streamlined way to handle this issue. It keeps proceedings moving without going through a long criminal trial. This is vital to avoid unnecessary adjournments in criminal cases.
2. Scope and Applicability of the Section
This section applies only when a witness has been legally summoned to appear before a Criminal Court and fails to do so without a justified excuse. The absence must be willful, careless, or without sufficient cause. It also covers situations where a witness leaves early without the court’s permission. However, the court must first be satisfied that trying the witness summarily is necessary in the interest of justice. This provision is limited in scope and doesn’t apply to general non-appearance unless a summons was duly served. It also ensures that no individual can avoid legal responsibilities. The court can act immediately under this section to preserve its authority.
3. Power of Summary Trial
The key feature of Section 389 is that it allows the court to summarily try and punish the witness. A summary trial is a quicker process with fewer formalities compared to regular trials. Before punishing the individual, the court must give him or her a chance to explain the absence. Only if the excuse is found to be unsatisfactory, the court can impose a fine. This immediate action helps reduce court delays caused by absent witnesses. It ensures that trials are not repeatedly postponed and justice is delivered in time. The summary nature keeps the process effective and efficient. This balance of fairness and firmness makes Section 389 a useful tool in court practice.
4. Penalty Provision – Maximum Fine Limit
Under BNSS 389, the maximum penalty that can be imposed is a fine of ₹500. There is no provision for imprisonment under this section. The focus is on deterring disobedience, not on harsh punishment. A nominal but enforceable fine is enough to encourage witnesses to respect summons. The fine serves as a legal warning that court directives cannot be ignored without consequence. Though the amount is small, the presence of a legal record can have further implications. If needed, other legal remedies may still be pursued under related sections. Thus, Section 389 uses minimal intervention to ensure maximum impact in maintaining court decorum.
5. Compliance with Summary Trial Procedure
The court must follow the procedure laid out for summary trials, as closely as possible. This ensures that the rights of the alleged offender are protected and the process remains transparent. Even in summary cases, the principles of natural justice must be observed. The accused witness must be informed of the accusation and given a fair opportunity to respond. The entire proceeding, though quick, must be properly recorded. This protects against misuse or arbitrary action. The application of summary procedure keeps the court’s action lawful, just, and accountable. It ensures that the section cannot be used in an oppressive or unfair way.
6. Judicial Discretion is Key
The use of BNSS 389 is entirely dependent on the discretion of the presiding judge or magistrate. The court must be convinced that the non-attendance was without valid cause and that taking summary action is necessary. Judges are not required to apply this section in every case of absence. It is used only when the integrity of proceedings is affected. This gives the courts enough flexibility to decide when a simple warning is enough and when formal action is needed. Discretion allows for balance between judicial efficiency and individual circumstances. Courts are expected to act reasonably and in good faith when using this power.
7. Preventing Delay in Justice Delivery
Witnesses are a crucial part of any criminal trial. Their timely presence is essential to maintain the momentum of proceedings. If witnesses ignore summons, trials get adjourned repeatedly. Section 389 acts as a deterrent against such delay tactics or casual behavior. It helps courts stick to their schedules and deliver timely judgments. The credibility of the justice system improves when cases don’t drag due to unnecessary delays. This provision aligns with the broader goal of BNSS – faster, efficient, and more accountable criminal justice. It sends a strong message that court orders are to be taken seriously.
8. Relationship with Other BNSS Sections
BNSS Section 389 is connected to sections like 384 (Contempt in Court’s Presence) and 385 (Procedure When More Serious Contempt Occurs). However, it is narrower in scope, focusing only on non-attendance of witnesses. It operates independently and doesn’t require the proceedings of those sections to be initiated. Section 389 also complements summary procedure rules, making the judicial system more agile. It can work alongside provisions related to summons and compulsion under the broader BNSS framework. This integrated structure ensures that each kind of misconduct is tackled in a specific and appropriate legal manner.
9. Real-World Application in Indian Courts
In Indian criminal courts, non-appearance of key witnesses is one of the top reasons for delays. Often, witnesses treat summons casually or intentionally avoid them due to fear, bribes, or inconvenience. Section 389 has proven effective in such instances by allowing the judge to act quickly. Courts have used this provision to levy fines and record the non-compliance, which deters future lapses. It also boosts the efficiency of police officers responsible for bringing witnesses. As a tool of courtroom discipline, this section reinforces respect for judicial authority without creating a heavy-handed environment.
10. A Step Toward Justice Reform
Section 389 represents the broader reform mindset of the BNSS 2023, which replaces the old CrPC. It introduces more practical, real-world solutions for age-old courtroom problems. With this section, the law addresses a routine but major issue—witness absenteeism—in a timely and targeted way. It empowers judges while protecting the witness’s rights. It simplifies the procedure and ensures results without lengthy litigation. As Indian courts work towards faster trials and reduced pendency, BNSS 389 is a small but significant step. It strengthens the idea that justice delayed is justice denied.
Example 1:
A witness in a theft case is summoned to appear before the Sessions Court in Mumbai on 1st July 2025. The person fails to appear and provides no valid reason. The court, after giving a chance to explain, imposes a ₹500 fine under BNSS Section 389.
Example 2:
In a criminal trial in Delhi, a key witness leaves the courtroom during proceedings without informing the judge. The court decides that a summary trial is necessary, and the person is fined for violating the terms of the legal summons as per BNSS 389.
BNSS Section 389 Short Information
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Section Name | BNSS Section 389 – Summary Procedure for Witness Disobedience |
| Purpose | Allows courts to act swiftly when a witness disobeys a legal summons or leaves without permission, ensuring smooth and timely trial proceedings. |
| Penalty | Court may impose a fine up to ₹500 after giving the witness a chance to explain. No imprisonment is allowed under this section. |
| Procedure | The process follows the summary trial method—quick, fair, and recorded. The witness must be heard before the fine is imposed. |
| Judicial Goal | Promotes accountability among witnesses, reduces trial delays, and supports the BNSS mission of faster, more efficient justice delivery. |
Why is BNSS 389 Needed?
BNSS 389 is vital to maintain discipline and punctuality in court proceedings. In many cases, trials are delayed because witnesses fail to appear, either due to negligence or intentional avoidance. This affects not just the accused and the complainant but also burdens the court system. BNSS 389 serves as a deterrent, warning witnesses of legal consequences if they ignore summonses. It enhances judicial efficiency by allowing quick and summary action. Moreover, it instills respect for court orders among the general public. Overall, the provision ensures smoother and faster trials, contributing to the larger goal of timely justice.
BNSS Section 389 FAQs
Q1. What is the main purpose of BNSS 389?
BNSS 389 is designed to penalize witnesses who fail to appear before a Criminal Court after receiving a summons, thereby maintaining discipline and avoiding trial delays.
Q2. What is the maximum punishment under BNSS 389?
Under BNSS 389, the court can impose a fine up to ₹500 for disobeying a legal summons, after conducting a summary trial.
Q3. Is imprisonment included in BNSS Section 389?
No, BNSS 389 allows only a monetary fine, not imprisonment.
Q4. Is BNSS 389 applicable to all types of witnesses?
Yes, BNSS 389 applies to any witness legally bound to appear before a Criminal Court and who disobeys a valid summons.
Q5. Can a witness defend themselves under BNSS 389?
Yes, the court must provide an opportunity to the witness to explain the absence before deciding on the punishment under BNSS 389..
Conclusion
BNSS Section 389 empowers courts to fine witnesses who ignore summons or skip hearings without reason. It ensures trials aren’t delayed by absent witnesses and keeps court proceedings disciplined and efficient through a quick, fair process.
Need Legal Support?
If you are dealing with court cases, marriage problems, or any other legal issue, our team at Marriage Solution – Lawyer Help is here for you. Simply fill out our quick online enquiry form, and we’ll connect you with the right legal expert to support your needs .
Finished with BNSS Section 389 ? Continue reading the next sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. Each section is explained in easy words, with simple examples, so anyone can understand it clearly.
- Section 390 BNSS : Appeals from convictions under sections 383, 384, 388 and 389.
- Section 391 BNSS : Judicial officers not allowed to hear cases of offences committed before them, except as stated in sections 383 to 389.
- Section 392 BNSS : Judgment
- Section 393 BNSS : Language and Contents of Court Judgment .
Full BNSS Section List: https://marriagesolution.in/bnss_section-list/
Full BNS Section List: https://marriagesolution.in/bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-section-list/
Full IPC Section List: https://marriagesolution.in/ipc-section-list
All Indian Law & Blogs: https://marriagesolution.in/indian-law/