Introduction of IPC 113
Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 113 deals with the liability of a person who helps plan a crime that ends up causing a different effect than what was intended. This section is important because it recognizes that criminal actions can have unexpected consequences, and those involved in planning should be held responsible for these outcomes.
What is IPC Section 113 ?
IPC Section 113 states that when a person assists in planning a crime, and that crime causes a different effect than what was intended, the helper can be held responsible for the actual effect caused. This applies as long as the person knew that the effect was likely to happen as a result of the crime they helped plan.
IPC Section 113 Overview
IPC Section 113 states that when an act abetted causes a different outcome than intended, but such an outcome is a probable consequence of the abetment, the abettor is held liable for this outcome. This means that the abettor is responsible for all probable results of their instigation.
Key Point 1: Extended Liability for Abettors
Extended Liability – IPC 113 extends the liability of the abettor to cover outcomes that are probable, even if unintended.
- Example: If A instigates B to cause minor harm to C, but B ends up causing serious injury to C, A is liable for the serious injury.
Key Point 2: Probable Consequence
Probable Consequence – The abettor is liable for acts that are a probable consequence of the abetment.
- Example: A abets B to set a small fire, but the fire spreads and causes extensive damage. A is liable for the extensive damage.
Key Point 3: Different Act but Probable Outcome
Different Act – Even if the committed act differs from the intended act, the abettor is responsible if the outcome was a probable consequence.
- Example: A abets B to steal a wallet, but B ends up robbing a bank. If robbery was a probable consequence, A is liable for the robbery.
Key Point 4: Ensuring Accountability
Accountability – This section ensures that abettors are accountable for all probable consequences of their actions, preventing them from escaping liability.
- Example: If A abets B to give C a mild drug, but B gives a stronger dose leading to severe harm, A is accountable for the severe harm.
Key Point 5: Legal Precedents
Legal Precedents – Various court cases have upheld the principles of extended liability under IPC 113.
- Case Reference: In a case where A abetted B to threaten C, but B ended up causing physical harm, the court held A liable for the harm.
Key Point 6: Importance in Criminal Law
Importance – IPC 113 is crucial in criminal law as it holds abettors liable for the full scope of their actions’ consequences, serving as a deterrent against abetment.
- Significance: It ensures justice by holding abettors responsible for all outcomes of their instigation, maintaining legal accountability.
113 IPC Punishment
The punishment under IPC Section 113 is equivalent to the punishment for the offense that actually occurs as a probable consequence of the abetment. This means that if the act committed is severe, the abettor faces the same severe penalties.
113 IPC bailable or not ?
The bailability of an offense under IPC 113 depends on the nature of the principal offense. If the principal offense is bailable, the abetment under IPC 113 is also bailable. If the principal offense is non-bailable, so is the abetment.
Section 113 IPC in short information
| Offense | Definition | Punishment | Bailable or Not |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abetment leading to a different but probable outcome | Liability for acts that differ from the intended but are probable consequences of the abetment | Same as the punishment for the probable consequence | Depends on the nature of the principal offense |
113 IPC FAQs
What does IPC Section 113 cover?
It covers the liability of an abettor for acts that are probable consequences of the abetment, even if those acts differ from what was intended.
Is the abettor liable for unintended consequences?
Yes, the abettor is liable for any probable consequences of the abetted act, even if those consequences were not specifically intended.
How is the punishment determined under IPC 113?
The punishment is the same as for the offense committed as a probable consequence of the abetment.
Is IPC Section 113 bailable?
The bailability depends on the nature of the principal offense abetted. If the principal offense is bailable, the abetment under IPC 113 is also bailable.
What is the significance of IPC 113 in criminal law?
It ensures comprehensive liability for abettors, holding them accountable for the full extent of probable consequences resulting from their actions, thereby maintaining legal accountability.
If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.
Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process effectively. Don’t hesitate to contact us for personalized solutions; we are here to assist you whenever necessary!