Introduction of BNS 53
BNS 53 deals with situations where someone encourages or helps another person to do something, and the result is different from what was originally intended. If the outcome of the encouraged action is more severe or different from what was planned, the person who encouraged the act is still responsible for that different result, as long as they knew that such an outcome was likely.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 53 replaces the old Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 113.
What is section 53 of BNS ?
BNS Section 53 says that if someone helps or encourages another person to commit an act, and the result is different or worse than what was intended, the person who helped is still responsible for the unexpected result. This is true if they knew that the act could lead to that different result.
BNS Section 53 in Simple Points
BNSS Section 53 explains that when a person abets (encourages, provokes, or helps) an act with a particular intention, but the act ends up causing a different result, the abettor is still responsible for the actual outcome. The law ensures that abettors cannot escape liability by saying, “I did not intend this result.” If the harm was predictable and foreseeable, they face the same punishment as if they had planned for that harm.
Key Explanations
1. Responsibility for Different Results
If you abet someone to do something with a particular effect in mind, but a different harm occurs, you are still responsible for that harm. The law does not only look at what you wanted but also at what actually happened.
2. Knowing the Risks
You will only be held liable if you knew or had reason to believe that such harm was a likely outcome of the act you encouraged. If the result was completely unforeseeable, liability may not apply.
3. Same Punishment for Different Results
Even if the actual result was not what you originally intended, you face the same punishment as if you had planned for that specific result. This ensures abettors cannot escape stricter penalties.
4. Predictable Harm
The section holds you accountable for any harm that was a natural or probable consequence of the act you abetted. If it was something any reasonable person could have foreseen, you are legally responsible.
5. Actual Harm Counts
The law gives importance to the real harm caused instead of the abettor’s personal intention. What matters is the effect that took place, not the effect the abettor wanted.
Important Legal Points
6. Different Result from Intended
If an abettor encouraged an act to achieve one result but another occurred, the abettor is still guilty of the result that actually happened.
7. Liability for Actual Effect
The abettor is accountable for the actual outcome, provided they knew that such an outcome was possible when they gave encouragement or assistance.
8. Same as Committed Offense
The punishment for the abettor will be the same as if they had abetted the result that actually occurred. For example, if someone abets a simple assault but it results in death, they may face the same punishment as for abetting culpable homicide.
9. Cognizable or Non-Cognizable
Whether the case is cognizable (police can register FIR and arrest without warrant) or non-cognizable depends on the nature of the actual offense committed.
10. Bailable or Non-Bailable & Court for Trial
Similarly, whether the case is bailable or non-bailable, and which court will try the case, depends on the seriousness and classification of the actual crime committed as a result of the abetment.
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 53
| Points | Details |
|---|---|
| Offence | Abetment of any offence where the outcome is different from what was intended. |
| Definition | If someone helps another commit a crime and a different or worse effect occurs, they are responsible for the outcome if they knew it could happen. |
| Punishment | Same as for the offence committed, depending on the specific case. |
| Cognizable or Non-Cognizable | Depends on the nature of the offence abetted. |
| Bailable or Non-Bailable | Depends on the nature of the offence abetted. |
| Court by Which Offence is Triable | Depends on the nature of the offence abetted. |
BNS Section 53 FAQs
What does BNS Section 53 cover?
It covers cases where the result of a crime is different from what was intended by the person who helped commit it.
What if the outcome is worse than expected?
The person who helped is still responsible for the result if they knew it could happen.
Is the punishment the same for all outcomes?
The punishment depends on the specific offence and its outcome.
If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.
Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process.