Introduction of BNS Section 51
BNS Section 51 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 deals with the concept of abetment when the effect is felt in India even if the act of abetment occurs outside India. This provision ensures that no offender can escape liability merely because the instigation or support happened beyond Indian territory. If the act abetted would be punishable under Indian law, the abettor is treated as if the crime had been committed within India itself.
This section replaces the older provision IPC Section 108B, giving a stronger framework to tackle cross-border crimes, including terrorism, cybercrimes, smuggling, and organized fraud. With globalization and digital interconnectedness, BNS 51 plays a crucial role in strengthening India’s jurisdiction against offences originating from abroad but impacting Indian citizens or interests.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Section 51 replaces the old Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 111.
What is section 51 of BNS ?
BNS Section 51 states that if you encourage someone to do a specific act and they do something different but related, you are still responsible for the act they did, as if you directly encouraged that specific act. This applies if the act done was a probable result of your encouragement or help.

BNS Section 51 in Simple Points
Where an abettor is liable to a punishment different in kind from that of the offence abetted, the abettor shall be punished with the punishment provided for such abetment under this Sanhita.
1. Meaning of Section 51
BNS Section 51 means that if you encourage someone to commit one crime, but they commit another related or likely crime instead, you are still legally responsible for it.
- You are treated as though you encouraged that specific crime.
- Liability arises only if the new act is a natural and probable result of your instigation.
2. Purpose of Section 51
The purpose of this section is to:
- Prevent abettors from escaping punishment just because a different act was committed.
- Ensure accountability for the chain of events that were likely caused by abetment.
- Strengthen deterrence by punishing those who encourage criminal behavior, even if the exact outcome changes.
3. Essential Ingredients of Section 51
For this section to apply, the following must be present:
- Act of Abetment – The abettor encouraged, instigated, or helped with an act.
- Different Act Committed – The person did a different but related act.
- Probable Consequence – The new act must be a natural or probable outcome of the instigation.
- Mens rea (Intention) – The abettor must have intended or known the risks of encouraging the crime.
4. Punishment under BNS Section 51
- The abettor is punished as if they abetted the act that was actually committed.
- The nature of punishment depends on the seriousness of the new crime.
- Trial and classification (bailable/non-bailable, cognizable/non-cognizable) are based on the offence that was ultimately committed.
5. Examples of BNS Section 51 in Action
Example 1 (Window Breaking → Theft):
A tells B to break a window. Instead, B breaks the window and steals valuables. Theft is a likely outcome of breaking into a house, so A is responsible for theft.
Example 2 (Fight → Grievous Hurt):
A encourages B to fight someone. B uses a knife and causes grievous injury. Since serious injury was a probable result of the fight, A is liable for grievous hurt.
Example 3 (Burglary → Injury):
A helps plan a burglary. During the burglary, B injures the house owner. A is also liable for the injury, as it was a likely result of burglary.
Example 4 (Unrelated Act – No Liability):
A tells B to rob a shop. Instead, B vandalizes a car. Since car damage was not a probable consequence of the encouragement, A is not liable for it.
6. Importance of Section 51
BNS Section 51 is important because it:
- Stops abettors from exploiting loopholes when the actual act differs.
- Ensures justice by linking responsibility to probable outcomes.
- Promotes fairness by punishing abettors for the chain of crimes they set into motion.
- Strengthens the law against conspiracies and planned crimes.
Section 51 BNS Overview
BNS Section 51 focuses on the liability of a person (known as the abettor) who encourages or helps another person to commit a crime. If a different crime happens instead, the abettor can still be held responsible. This section makes sure that people who encourage criminal behavior are held accountable, even if the crime committed isn’t exactly what they intended.
Abettor’s Responsibility:
- If you encourage someone to commit a crime, and they commit a different crime, you can still be held responsible.
- Example: If you tell someone to break a window, but they steal from the house instead, you might be responsible for the theft.
Probable Consequence:
- You are only responsible if the different act was a likely result of your encouragement.
- Example: If you tell someone to fight, and they use a weapon, you might be responsible if using a weapon was a likely outcome.
Influence of Instigation:
- You are liable if the act was done under your influence or because of your encouragement.
- Example: If someone steals because you convinced them to, you are partly to blame.
Intent and Result:
- Your intention and the result of your encouragement matter; if you intended a crime and a related crime happens, you’re responsible.
- Example: If you planned a burglary and someone was hurt during it, you might be responsible for the injury too.
Direct vs. Indirect Acts:
- Even if you didn’t directly commit the crime, your encouragement makes you responsible.
- Example: Telling someone to commit a crime makes you just as guilty as if you did it yourself.
Limitations of Liability:
- You are not responsible for completely unrelated acts that were not a likely outcome of your encouragement.
- Example: If you told someone to rob a store and they decided to damage a car instead, you might not be responsible for the damage.
Conspiracy Role:
- If you help plan a crime, you are responsible for what happens during that crime.
- Example: Planning a theft and providing tools for it makes you responsible for what happens during the theft.
Accidental Outcomes:
- If the crime committed was an accident but was likely given the situation, you might still be liable.
- Example: If someone you encouraged accidentally harms someone while committing a crime, you could be responsible.
Different Crime, Same Responsibility:
- You are responsible for the crime that was actually committed, even if it wasn’t the one you encouraged.
- Example: Encouraging someone to vandalize, but they commit arson, still holds you responsible for arson if it was a likely outcome.
Non-Criminal Outcomes:
- If the outcome was not a crime, you are not liable under this section.
- Example: Encouraging someone to protest peacefully is not a crime, so you aren’t liable if no crime is committed.
Comparison: BNS Section 51 vs IPC Section 111
| Section | Offense | Punishment | Bailable / Non-Bailable | Cognizable / Non-Cognizable | Trial By |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS Section 51 |
Liability of abettor when one act is abetted but a different act is done. The abettor is liable if the different act is a probable consequence of the instigation or assistance. |
Punishment is the same as for the act that was actually committed, provided it was a likely outcome of the abetment. | Depends on the nature of the offence actually committed. | Depends on whether the offence committed is cognizable or not. | Tried by the court competent to try the offence actually committed. |
| IPC Section 111 (Old) | Similar principle: if one act is abetted and another is done, the abettor is liable if the act done was a probable consequence of the abetment. | Same punishment as for the act committed, subject to the requirement that it was a likely result of the abetment. | Depends on the nature of the offence committed under IPC. | Cognizability is determined by the actual offence committed. | Tried by the court that would try the substantive offence committed. |
BNS Section 51 FAQs
What does BNS Section 51 cover?
It covers situations where someone is responsible for a different crime than the one they encouraged, as long as it was a likely outcome.
Can I be blamed for a crime I didn’t specifically encourage?
Yes, if the crime that happened was a likely result of your encouragement or help.
What if the crime wasn’t likely to happen?
If the different crime wasn’t a likely outcome of your encouragement, you aren’t responsible.
Does helping in planning count under BNS Section 51?
Yes, if you help plan a crime and a different but related crime happens, you are still responsible.
Conclusion
BNS Section 51 is a vital safeguard in India’s criminal justice system, ensuring that crimes planned or supported outside India but affecting Indian law and order are duly punishable. By bringing abettors outside Indian territory under the ambit of Indian law, this section strengthens the fight against terrorism, cyberattacks, smuggling networks, and cross-border fraud.
It reinforces the principle that geographical boundaries cannot shield criminals, making India’s legal system more robust and globally responsive. For law students, professionals, and citizens, understanding BNS 51 is essential to grasp how India combats modern transnational crimes under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
Need Legal Support?
If you are dealing with court cases, marriage problems, or any other legal issue, our team at Marriage Solution – Lawyer Help is here for you. Simply fill out our quick online enquiry form, and we’ll connect you with the right legal expert to support your needs.
Finished with BNS 51? Continue exploring the next provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. Each section includes explanations, examples, and plain-language breakdowns for easy understanding.
- BNS 51 : Liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done
https://marriagesolution.in/bns_section/bns-51/ - BNS 52 : Abettor when liable to cumulative punishment for act abetted and for act done
- https://marriagesolution.in/bns_section/bns-52/
- BNS 53 : Liability of abettor for an effect caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor
- https://marriagesolution.in/bns_section/bns-53/
- BNS Section 54 : Abettor present when offence is committed
- https://marriagesolution.in/bns_section/bns-section-54/
- 55 BNS : Abetment of offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life
- https://marriagesolution.in/bns_section/55-bns/
- BNS 56 : Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment
https://marriagesolution.in/bns_section/bns-56/
Full IPC Section List: https://marriagesolution.in/ipc-section-list
All Indian Law & Blogs: https://marriagesolution.in/indian-law/
Full BNSS Section List: https://marriagesolution.in/bnss_section-list