Introduction to Section 375 BNSS
Section 375 BNSS is a procedural provision under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. It gives the State Government the power to authorize the jail officer-in-charge to perform duties that are normally assigned to the Inspector-General of Prisons. This section mainly applies to prisoners detained under Section 369 or Section 374, usually those with mental health issues. It simplifies and speeds up the decision-making process in such sensitive cases.
What is BNSS Section 375?
BNSS Section 375 states that the State Government may empower the jail officer-in-charge, where a person is confined under Section 369 or 374, to carry out all or some functions of the Inspector-General of Prisons under Sections 376 or 377. This is important because those sections deal with discharge or treatment of mentally ill prisoners. The section streamlines administration and ensures timely support and monitoring in such cases.
BNSS Section of 375 in Simple Points
1. Delegation of Power by State Government
BNSS Section 375 enables the State Government to legally assign certain powers to the jail officer-in-charge, specifically where a person is detained under Sections 369 or 374. These detainees are usually mentally ill individuals who are either undergoing trial or have been acquitted on grounds of unsoundness of mind. Since prison administration in such cases involves both legal and medical concerns, this section allows the officer to act in place of the Inspector-General of Prisons. The delegation must be done officially, ensuring proper accountability and authority.
2. When Is This Section Used?
This provision applies only in cases where a person is confined due to mental incapacity and falls under Section 369 (during trial/investigation) or Section 374 (after acquittal but held in safe custody). These are sensitive cases that require timely medical and legal actions. Instead of routing every decision through the Inspector-General, Section 375 makes it legally valid for a local officer to handle those duties, without compromising due process.
3. Powers Transferred to Officer-in-Charge
The jail officer, once empowered, can perform duties under Section 376 (release or care decisions) and Section 377 (transfer to appropriate institutions). These powers are critical because they affect the health, safety, and liberty of individuals with unsound minds. Such authority includes ordering medical observation, transfers, and release based on treatment progress. However, the officer-in-charge must act strictly under legal and medical guidelines, not arbitrarily.
4. Improves Administrative Efficiency in Mental Health Cases
Section 375 is a solution to reduce bureaucratic delays in mental health-related cases. It empowers local jail authorities to act in real-time, especially when urgent psychiatric intervention or custody changes are needed. This delegation supports the principle of speedy justice and humane treatment of mentally ill prisoners. It also prevents undue burden on top prison officials, allowing them to focus on policy while routine decisions are managed locally.
5. Legal Safeguards Still Apply
Though power is delegated, the jail officer must still follow the rules, medical reports, and protocols laid out in other provisions of BNSS and the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017. The section ensures that no decision is taken without medical basis or legal approval. It balances power with responsibility and provides flexibility without reducing safeguards for mentally ill or acquitted individuals.
375 BNSS Overview
BNSS 375 ensures administrative flexibility in handling persons confined due to unsoundness of mind. Since the Inspector-General of Prisons cannot be involved in every individual case, this section permits the State Government to delegate specific responsibilities to the jail officer. It is particularly useful in situations requiring urgent decisions regarding medical care, release, or custody under mental health law. It aims to bring efficiency, responsiveness, and care into the prison system.
10 Key Points – BNSS Section 375
1. Purpose of Section 375
Section 375 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) empowers the State Government to delegate certain powers. This provision is used when a person is confined under Section 369 (release or detention of mentally ill accused) or Section 374 (safe custody after acquittal due to unsound mind). Instead of requiring the direct involvement of the Inspector-General of Prisons, the State Government may authorize the jail officer-in-charge to perform necessary functions. This delegation is practical and time-saving. It ensures that the accused receives timely decisions regarding their detention or release. The provision aligns with the broader goal of efficient jail and mental health management under BNSS.
2. Delegation of Authority by State Government
The section clearly allows the State Government to assign responsibilities usually held by the Inspector-General of Prisons. The jail’s officer-in-charge can be given either all or selected functions of the Inspector-General. This delegation is crucial in day-to-day functioning, especially in cases involving mental health and prolonged custodial care. It avoids administrative delays and ensures quick responses. The power remains within the framework of law, and the State’s authority remains intact. Delegating power does not dilute responsibility—it streamlines it.
3. Applicable Only in Specific Legal Contexts
BNSS Section 375 is not universally applicable to all prisoners. It specifically applies to individuals detained under Section 369 (mentally unfit persons under trial or inquiry) and Section 374 (persons acquitted due to insanity but held in safe custody). This restriction ensures the provision is used for sensitive mental health-related cases, where quick decisions on medical care, release, or detention are often required. It ensures such cases are not delayed by excessive procedural hierarchies and empowers local authority for urgent legal compliance.
4. Connection with Sections 376 and 377
The officer in charge is empowered to carry out functions under Section 376 and Section 377, which typically fall under the Inspector-General of Prisons. These sections deal with the treatment and discharge of individuals detained due to unsoundness of mind. By linking Section 375 with 376 and 377, the law ensures continuity in mental health legal processes. This cross-referencing is a legal technique to avoid contradictions and enable proper delegation and supervision. The jail officer, once empowered, may make crucial decisions regarding care, custody, or release based on medical advice.
5. Legal Safeguards Remain in Place
Even with delegation, the law ensures that the rights and treatment of the confined individual are not compromised. The officer in charge, once empowered, must follow the procedures, safeguards, and limitations as prescribed for the Inspector-General. The delegation does not give blanket powers—it simply allows smoother functioning. The decision-making must still be guided by medical advice, legal provisions, and ethical standards. Thus, Section 375 strengthens the administrative machinery without weakening legal protections for mentally ill or acquitted individuals.
6. Promotes Faster Administrative Decision-Making
BNSS 375 helps avoid delays caused by the need to wait for directions from higher-level officers. In cases involving health or mental illness, delayed action can worsen the condition of the person. This provision ensures that the officer-in-charge can act promptly in accordance with the law, medical reports, and family submissions. It is especially useful in emergencies such as sudden health deterioration, transfer needs, or eligibility for conditional release. It enables faster and localized decision-making within legal bounds.
7. Reduces Burden on Inspector-General of Prisons
The Inspector-General of Prisons is responsible for supervising all jails and custodial institutions in a state. Delegating powers in select mental health-related cases reduces the administrative burden on the IG. This helps the Inspector-General focus on larger policy and institutional matters while the jail officer handles individual cases with appropriate authority. This structure makes the prison system more responsive, less bureaucratic, and legally adaptive to individual needs.
8. Enhances Efficiency in Mental Health-Related Detentions
Most of the cases dealt with under Sections 369 and 374 involve individuals who need mental health care, observation, and periodic reviews. These matters are both legal and medical in nature. With delegated powers, the jail officer can coordinate more efficiently with hospitals, specialists, and the court. It enhances institutional efficiency in dealing with vulnerable prisoners while ensuring accountability. BNSS 375, therefore, stands as a bridge between legal responsibility and administrative execution.
9. Must Be Notified by the State Government
The delegation of power under Section 375 must be made officially by the State Government through a formal notification. Without this, the officer in charge cannot act beyond their regular duties. This safeguard ensures accountability, traceability, and clarity in who holds decision-making power. It also makes sure that such power is not exercised arbitrarily. The rule emphasizes that legal delegation must be transparent and documented.
10. Balancing Mental Health Justice and Administrative Function
Ultimately, BNSS 375 serves the goal of balancing mental health justice with administrative functionality. It recognizes that those acquitted or detained due to unsoundness of mind need swift, thoughtful, and structured care. By empowering the officer-in-charge to act on behalf of higher authority, the section enables timely decisions without compromising legality. It is a modern, flexible provision that fits into the larger vision of humane and efficient justice under BNSS.
Example 1:
A man acquitted due to unsoundness of mind is detained under Section 374. Instead of waiting for instructions from the Inspector-General, the jail officer-in-charge—empowered by the State Government—orders immediate psychiatric care under Section 376.
Example 2:
A woman detained under Section 369 is responding well to treatment. The State Government has authorized the officer-in-charge to perform duties under Section 377, and the officer coordinates her transfer to a supervised rehabilitation home.
BNSS Section 375 Short Information
| Key Point | Description |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Allows State to delegate IG duties to jail officer in mental health cases |
| Applicable Sections | Related to Sections 369 and 374 of BNSS |
| Delegated Functions | Includes duties under Sections 376 and 377 |
| Requires State Notification | Formal government order is required for delegation |
| Administrative Efficiency | Ensures quick legal and medical action in jails |
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Section Name | BNSS Section 375 |
| Main Purpose | Allows the State Government to delegate duties of the Inspector-General of Prisons to the jail officer for mental health-related detentions. |
| Applicable Sections | Applies to persons detained under Sections 369 (mentally unfit accused) and 374 (acquitted due to insanity but kept in custody). |
| Delegated Powers | Jail officer may perform duties under Sections 376 and 377, handling medical care, custody, or release as per State notification. |
| Goal | Improves efficiency, ensures timely medical and legal actions, and maintains humane treatment under Mental Healthcare Act, 2017. |
BNSS Section 375 FAQs
BNSS 375
Conclusion
BNSS Section 375 helps the State Government manage mental health cases in prisons more efficiently by allowing the jail officer to act on behalf of the Inspector-General. It ensures timely care, legal compliance, and humane handling of mentally ill detainees without waiting for high-level approvals.
Need Legal Support?
If you are dealing with court cases, marriage problems, or any other legal issue, our team at Marriage Solution – Lawyer Help is here for you. Simply fill out our quick online enquiry form, and we’ll connect you with the right legal expert to support your needs .