Section 477 BNSS : State Government to proceed after Central Government’s approval .

---

Introduction to Section 477 BNSS

Section 477 BNSS deals with the requirement of concurrence between the State Government and the Central Government in certain cases before remission or commutation of sentences. It ensures that in sensitive matters involving central investigations, Union property, or central government officials, state decisions cannot be made independently. This provision strengthens cooperation between both levels of government and safeguards national interests.

---

---

What is BNSS Section 477 ?

BNSS Section 477 mandates that the State Government must seek concurrence from the Central Government before granting remission or commutation of sentences in certain cases. These include offences investigated by central agencies, crimes against Union property, or offences committed by central government officials during official duties. It ensures federal coordination and safeguards national interests.

---

---

BNSS Section of 477 in Simple Points

1. Central Approval in Sensitive Cases

BNSS 477 mandates that state governments obtain central approval in cases involving offences linked to Union interests. This includes crimes under investigation by central agencies or affecting Union property. By doing so, it prevents unilateral state actions in sensitive matters. This process strengthens legal uniformity and enhances administrative cooperation. It ensures that sensitive issues are not handled independently at the state level, maintaining national oversight.

2. Offences Investigated by Central Agencies

If a case is investigated by a central agency such as the CBI or ED, remission or commutation cannot be decided solely by the state. The central government’s concurrence is necessary to maintain legal consistency. Since these agencies act under Union authority, their cases demand central involvement. This approach respects the jurisdiction of central investigative bodies. It ensures state decisions do not contradict Union-led investigations.

3. Crimes Involving Union Property or Interests

BNSS 477 also applies to offences involving damage or misuse of central government property. For such crimes, the state cannot independently remit or commute sentences without central consent. This provision safeguards national assets and Union-owned resources. It ensures punishment decisions in such cases align with Union policies. This coordination preserves national security and prevents misuse of state-level powers.

4. Offences by Central Government Employees

The section includes offences committed by central government employees during official duties. Here, central concurrence is vital to ensure uniform disciplinary and penal actions. It prevents states from interfering in Union service matters. This ensures that any remission or commutation involving Union officials is centrally supervised. It strengthens administrative control and accountability at the national level.

5. Concurrent Sentences Linked to Union Matters

When convicts face concurrent sentences involving both state and Union matters, remission granted by the state will not be valid until the Centre approves it for Union-related offences. This ensures decisions are coordinated between both governments. It avoids partial relief in cases with mixed jurisdiction. This provision upholds fairness and prevents legal conflicts between the two levels of governance.

---

477 BNSS Overview

BNSS 477 creates a framework where the State Government must consult and obtain approval from the Central Government before exercising its powers under BNSS Sections 473 (remission/suspension) and 474 (commutation) in specific cases. It promotes federal balance, prevents jurisdictional conflicts, and ensures uniform decision-making in sensitive matters that impact Union authority or involve offences under central jurisdiction.

BNSS Section 477: State Government to Act After Concurrence with Central Government in Certain Cases

1. Mandatory Concurrence with Central Government

BNSS Section 477 mandates that the State Government must obtain approval from the Central Government before exercising its powers of remission or commutation in certain cases. These cases involve offences linked to central agencies, central property, or central government officials. This provision ensures centralized oversight in sensitive matters. It strengthens coordination between the Union and State governments, preventing unilateral decisions in cases impacting national interests.

2. Link with BNSS Sections 473 and 474

This section is closely tied to BNSS Sections 473 (suspension/remission) and 474 (commutation). While these powers generally lie with the State Government, BNSS 477 limits their independent use for specific cases. It creates a legal framework where state actions require central concurrence in issues involving Union concerns. This dual approach ensures balance between state autonomy and national governance, promoting consistency and fairness.

3. Cases Involving Central Agency Investigations

BNSS 477 applies when the offence in question was investigated by a central agency operating under a Central Act (e.g., CBI, ED). Since such agencies function under Union laws, state decisions in these cases must align with central oversight. This prevents conflicts between state and Union authorities, ensuring that sensitive investigations are handled uniformly.

4. Offences Against Central Government Property

The provision covers cases involving damage, destruction, or misappropriation of central government property. Here, remission or commutation powers cannot be used by states independently. Since such offences affect national assets, central concurrence is required to safeguard Union interests. This ensures that decisions impacting central property are taken only after Union approval.

5. Offences by Central Government Servants

BNSS 477 includes cases involving central government officials acting in the discharge of official duties. When such offences occur, any decision by the State Government to remit or commute punishment must first be approved by the Centre. This prevents state-level interference in disciplinary or penal matters concerning Union employees and maintains administrative discipline at the national level.

6. Concurrent Sentences Linked to Union Power

Under sub-section (2), when a convict faces concurrent sentences involving both state and Union matters, state orders for remission or commutation will only take effect if similar action is taken by the Centre for Union-related offences. This ensures that both authorities act in harmony, avoiding partial or inconsistent enforcement.

7. Prevention of Jurisdictional Conflict

This section avoids conflicts between state and central powers by clearly defining situations requiring central concurrence. It ensures that the Union’s executive domain is respected while allowing states to function within their boundaries. This coordination mechanism strengthens federal governance and maintains administrative balance.

8. Uniform Decision-Making in Sensitive Cases

BNSS 477 enforces uniform decision-making in sensitive cases that have broader implications for national governance. It ensures that remission or commutation orders in such matters are not made arbitrarily or inconsistently across states. This harmonization upholds legal certainty and equal treatment across India.

9. Protection of National Interests

By requiring concurrence from the Central Government, this provision safeguards national interests. It prevents states from granting remission in cases that could undermine central authority or security. This is crucial for maintaining law and order in offences tied to Union subjects and government functions.

10. Strengthening Federal Coordination

BNSS 477 embodies cooperative federalism by requiring joint action between the State and Central Governments in select cases. It balances state autonomy with central supervision to maintain fairness and protect sensitive Union-linked interests. This dual control reinforces the strength of India’s legal and administrative system.

Example 1:

A state court convicts an individual for damaging Central Government property during a protest. Before granting remission, the State Government must seek approval from the Central Government as per BNSS 477.

Example 2:

A central government employee is convicted of fraud committed during official duties. The State Government cannot commute his sentence without concurrence from the Central Government due to his Union service link.

---

BNSS Section 477 Short Information

Key Point	Explanation (Short)
Central Concurrence Required	State must seek Centre’s approval in certain cases.
Covers Central Investigations	Offences investigated by central agencies need concurrence.
Union Property Offences	Crimes affecting central property require Centre approval.
Central Govt. Employees	Offences by Union officials in duty need concurrence.
Concurrent Sentences Rule	State remission valid only after Centre’s similar action.

---

Why BNSS 47 is Needed ?

BNSS 477 is necessary to ensure cooperative federalism and national oversight in sensitive cases. It prevents states from making independent decisions on offences that directly impact Union interests. By requiring central concurrence, it maintains legal consistency across states and safeguards national property, officials, and investigations. This provision also prevents jurisdictional conflicts, ensuring harmony between state and central powers. It ultimately strengthens governance by balancing autonomy with necessary central supervision in serious matters.

---

BNSS Section 477 FAQs

BNSS 477

---

If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.

Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process.

---