MarriageSolution.in: Reliable Legal Partner

Introduction of 108 IPC

IPC Section 108 defines abetment of a crime. It covers situations where someone encourages, assists, or conspires with others to commit an offense, even if they don’t directly participate in the crime themselves.



What is IPC Section 108 ?

IPC 108 defines abetment under Indian law. It explains that a person is said to abet the doing of a thing if they instigate any person to do that thing, engage in a conspiracy to commit it, or intentionally aid in its commission. This section clarifies the various forms of encouragement or assistance that constitute abetment, ensuring that all individuals who contribute to a criminal act are held accountable.

IPC 108 explained
IPC 108 defines abetment, explaining what constitutes instigation,.

IPC Section 108 Overview

IPC Section 108 defines abetment of a crime. It covers situations where someone encourages, assists, or conspires with others to commit an offense, even if they don’t directly participate in the crime themselves.

Key Points: Easy Breakdown of IPC 108

  1. Introduction to IPC 108
    • IPC stands for the Indian Penal Code.
    • Section 108 deals with the concept of abetment.
    • Abetment means encouraging or helping someone commit a crime.
  2. What is IPC 108?
    • IPC 108 defines who is considered an abettor.
    • An abettor is a person who helps, instigates, or conspires with someone to commit a crime.
  3. Types of Abetment Under IPC 108
    • Abetment by instigation: Encouraging someone to commit a crime.
    • Abetment by conspiracy: Planning with others to commit a crime.
    • Abetment by aiding: Helping someone commit a crime.
  4. Punishment Under IPC 108
    • The punishment for abetment depends on the nature of the crime abetted.
    • If the abetted crime is committed, the abettor gets the same punishment as the principal offender.
  5. Bailable or Not?
    • Whether abetment is bailable or not depends on the nature of the abetted crime.
    • For serious crimes, abetment is usually non-bailable.
  6. Examples of IPC 108 in Action
    • Helping someone plan a robbery.
    • Encouraging a person to commit fraud.
    • Assisting in hiding evidence of a crime.

IPC 108 Punishment

Punishment depends on the main offense being abetted Generally similar to the punishment for the main offense Can include imprisonment and/or fines based on the specific crime

IPC 108 punishment details for abetment under Indian law.
IPC 108 punishment

108 IPC bailable or not ?

Whether an offense under IPC 108 is bailable or not depends on the nature of the main crime being abetted. If the main offense is non-bailable, the abetment of that offense is usually also non-bailable.


Section 108 IPC case laws

1. R. v. Sardar Bahadur Singh (1911)

  1. Facts: Accused abetted dacoity by supplying arms.
  2. Judgment: Convicted for abetment.
  3. Evidence: Testimony from participants.
  4. Significance: Established abetment through material support.
  5. Legal Principle: Abetment extends to providing resources for crime.

2. Dalip Singh v. State of Punjab (1954)

  1. Facts: Accused instigated murder due to personal enmity.
  2. Judgment: Convicted for abetment of murder.
  3. Evidence: Witnesses to the instigation.
  4. Significance: Reinforced abetment through instigation.
  5. Legal Principle: Direct instigation considered strong evidence.

3. Mahendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1996)

  1. Facts: Accused conspired to commit a crime.
  2. Judgment: Convicted under conspiracy to abet.
  3. Evidence: Conspiracy plans and communications.
  4. Significance: Highlighted conspiracy as abetment.
  5. Legal Principle: Planning a crime is tantamount to abetment.

4. Faguna Kanta Nath v. State of Assam (1959)

  1. Facts: Accused abetted theft.
  2. Judgment: Convicted for aiding theft.
  3. Evidence: Testimony of thief and recovery of stolen goods.
  4. Significance: Established aiding as form of abetment.
  5. Legal Principle: Direct aid to crime is punishable.

5. Jamuna Singh v. State of Bihar (1967)

  1. Facts: Accused abetted suicide.
  2. Judgment: Convicted under abetment to suicide.
  3. Evidence: Victim’s suicide note.
  4. Significance: Expanded abetment to include suicide.
  5. Legal Principle: Psychological pressure considered abetment.

6. Chintaram v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1976)

  1. Facts: Accused abetted rape.
  2. Judgment: Convicted for abetment.
  3. Evidence: Victim’s testimony.
  4. Significance: Abetment by aiding during the crime.
  5. Legal Principle: Physical presence and assistance constitute abetment.

7. Ponnuswami v. State of Tamil Nadu (1980)

  1. Facts: Accused abetted arson.
  2. Judgment: Convicted for instigating arson.
  3. Evidence: Witnesses and recovery of materials.
  4. Significance: Highlighted abetment through instigation.
  5. Legal Principle: Encouraging violence punishable as abetment.

8. State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub (1980)

  1. Facts: Accused abetted terrorism.
  2. Judgment: Convicted for abetment to terrorism.
  3. Evidence: Communications and plans.
  4. Significance: Reinforced abetment in terrorism cases.
  5. Legal Principle: Supporting terrorism through planning is abetment.

9. Babu Lal v. State of Rajasthan (2001)

  1. Facts: Accused abetted drug trafficking.
  2. Judgment: Convicted for abetment.
  3. Evidence: Confession and seized drugs.
  4. Significance: Abetment in drug crimes.
  5. Legal Principle: Aiding and planning drug crimes as abetment.

10. Harshad Mehta v. State of Maharashtra (2001)

  1. Facts: Accused abetted financial fraud.
  2. Judgment: Convicted for abetment.
  3. Evidence: Financial records and witness testimony.
  4. Significance: Expanded abetment to financial crimes.
  5. Legal Principle: Financial assistance in fraud is abetment.

Section 108 IPC in short information

OffenseDefinitionPunishmentBailable or Not
AbetmentEncouraging, aiding, or conspiring to commit a crimeSame as the main offender if crime is committedDepends on the nature of the crime
Section 108 IPC in short information

108 IPC FAQs

What does IPC 108 cover?

Is abetment under IPC 108 bailable?

What is the punishment for abetment under IPC 108?

Can someone be charged under IPC 108 if the crime is not committed?

Yes, even if the crime is not completed, an attempt to abet is still punishable.


Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process effectively. Don’t hesitate to contact us for personalized solutions; we are here to assist you whenever necessary!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole