304 BNS

---

Introduction of 304 BNS

304 BNS defines and penalizes the crime of snatching. Snatching occurs when theft is committed by suddenly, quickly, or forcibly taking away someone’s movable property from their possession. It is considered a serious crime due to the element of force or suddenness involved. This section aims to safeguard individuals against such acts and provides for punishment that includes imprisonment and a fine. It ensures public safety and deters offenders from engaging in such violent theft.

---

---

What is BNS Section 304 ?

Snatching, under BNS Section 304, is a specific type of theft involving a quick or forceful seizure of movable property from a person or their possession. The offense becomes snatching when the act is carried out suddenly, with or without the use of force. The punishment for snatching is imprisonment for up to three years and a fine, reflecting the seriousness of this offense.

---

---

BNS 304 in Simple Points

1. Definition of Snatching

Snatching is a form of theft involving the sudden or forcible taking away of movable property from a person. This offense typically occurs in public places where the victim is caught off guard. For example, snatching a purse or phone directly from someone’s hands qualifies as snatching. The sudden nature of the act creates fear and violates the victim’s sense of security, which is why it is treated as a severe crime under this section.

2. Use of Suddenness or Force

The offense of snatching is characterized by the suddenness or force with which the movable property is taken. The act may involve a physical struggle or intimidation to seize the property quickly. For instance, a thief grabbing a gold chain from a woman’s neck in a crowded street demonstrates the use of force or quick action. This aspect makes snatching different from other types of theft, emphasizing the harm caused to the victim.

3. Punishment for Snatching

Under BNS Section 304(2), anyone found guilty of snatching may face imprisonment of up to three years along with a fine. The punishment aims to deter individuals from engaging in such aggressive thefts. In cases where the offender has a history of similar crimes, the punishment may be harsher. This provision reflects the importance of protecting citizens from such sudden and violent acts.

4. Legal Classification of Snatching

Snatching is classified as a cognizable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable offense. This means the police have the authority to register the case and arrest the offender without prior approval from a magistrate. Furthermore, the offense is non-compoundable, meaning it cannot be settled between the victim and the offender. These legal provisions highlight the gravity of this crime.

5. Role of Magistrate in Trials

Snatching cases are triable by any magistrate under the law. This ensures that the judicial process for such cases is streamlined and accessible. The role of the magistrate is to ensure a fair trial, evaluate the evidence presented, and pronounce the punishment based on the severity of the offense. This mechanism ensures that justice is delivered efficiently to the victims of snatching.

---

Section 304 BNS Overview

BNS Section 304 deals with the criminal offense of snatching, which involves the sudden or forceful taking of movable property from a person or their possession. Snatching is distinguished from regular theft due to the element of speed, surprise, and/or physical force used to take the property. Unlike theft, where the property is taken without the victim’s knowledge, snatching typically occurs quickly and in the victim’s presence, causing fear and distress. The section ensures that such acts are punishable with imprisonment and a fine, reflecting the severity of the crime and the harm it causes to the victim.

10 Key Points of BNS Section 304

1. Definition and Nature of Snatching

Snatching is a specific type of theft where the offender seizes or takes property from a person in a sudden or forceful manner. It usually involves taking something from the victim’s hand, such as a bag, phone, or jewelry. The suddenness of the act leaves the victim with little time to react, making it an offense that causes immediate harm. The force or speed involved may be physical, as in grabbing a purse, or even as simple as snatching a phone from someone’s pocket. The offense typically takes place in public places, where there are more chances for the offender to escape quickly.

2. Suddenness and Quickness

A key characteristic of snatching is the speed with which the property is taken. The offender does not plan the theft over a long period but acts quickly, often catching the victim off guard. For example, grabbing someone’s phone from their hand in a crowded area is an act of snatching. The element of surprise is critical, as it prevents the victim from reacting in time to protect their belongings. In such instances, the victim is left feeling vulnerable and violated. The law recognizes this suddenness as a key factor in determining the offense of snatching.

3. Forcible Seizure of Property

While some cases of snatching may involve a simple grab, others may involve physical force to wrestle the property away from the victim. This could mean pushing or pulling the victim in an attempt to grab an item like a purse or wallet. For instance, a thief might pull a bag off someone’s shoulder in a busy market. The use of force makes snatching more serious compared to other forms of theft, as it involves not just stealing, but also causing potential harm or injury to the victim. This forcible element is what distinguishes snatching from a simple pickpocketing incident.

4. The Offense Occurs in the Victim’s Presence

Unlike traditional theft, snatching happens in the presence of the victim, which increases the sense of violation. The victim becomes an immediate witness to the act, often unable to do anything to stop it. For example, if a person is walking on the street and someone suddenly snatches their bag, the victim is left helpless, often in shock. The victim’s fear and distress contribute to the severity of the crime. This is one reason why snatching is classified as a more severe offense in comparison to theft where the victim may not even realize the crime has occurred.

5. Punishment for Snatching

BNS Section 304 specifies that anyone found guilty of snatching shall be punished with imprisonment for a term that may extend up to three years, along with a fine. The severity of the punishment reflects the seriousness of the crime. The penalty serves as a deterrent, warning would-be offenders of the consequences of engaging in such acts. Imprisonment and fines are intended to discourage the use of force in theft, and to protect individuals from becoming victims of this kind of crime. The law aims to maintain public safety by imposing strict penalties for offenses like snatching.

6. Cognizable Offense

Snatching is classified as a cognizable offense under BNS Section 304, meaning the police have the authority to arrest the accused without a warrant. This ensures a quicker response from law enforcement, allowing them to apprehend the offender before they can escape. Once a complaint is lodged, the police can begin investigating the crime immediately. This classification also means that snatching is considered a more serious crime than non-cognizable offenses, which require prior permission from a magistrate to arrest. The cognizable nature of snatching helps ensure that such offenses are dealt with promptly and seriously.

7. Non-Bailable Offense

Snatching, under BNS Section 304, is a non-bailable offense, which means that the accused cannot seek bail as a matter of right. This makes it more difficult for the accused to gain immediate release after being arrested. The non-bailable nature reflects the seriousness of the offense, especially given that snatching often involves force and is committed in public. This provision ensures that the offender remains in custody until the case is heard in court, where the gravity of the offense will be evaluated. The law emphasizes that such violent theft should not be treated lightly, and it ensures that justice is served.

8. Non-Compoundable Offense

Snatching is a non-compoundable offense under BNS Section 304, meaning it cannot be settled between the victim and the accused. The law does not allow the parties involved to reach a private settlement, ensuring that the offender faces the consequences of their actions in a court of law. This ensures that snatching remains a serious crime with public interest, preventing the possibility of bribery or coercion for a private resolution. The state has an interest in prosecuting such crimes to maintain order and protect its citizens, regardless of any agreement between the victim and offender.

9. Triable by Any Magistrate

The offense of snatching is triable by any magistrate, which means that the case can be heard in any court with the authority to try such crimes. This ensures that the legal process is accessible and efficient, allowing victims to get justice without unnecessary delays. The flexibility in jurisdiction helps reduce the burden on higher courts and ensures that the case is resolved at a local level. By making snatching triable in any magistrate’s court, the law ensures swift and accessible justice for all parties involved.

10. Public Safety and Deterrence

One of the primary objectives of BNS Section 304 is to ensure public safety by deterring individuals from committing snatching. The severity of the punishment, along with the quick arrest powers granted to police, aims to reduce the occurrence of such crimes. Snatching is a crime that directly affects public security, as it often happens in busy areas, such as markets or streets. By treating snatching as a serious offense, the law not only punishes offenders but also sends a strong message that such acts will not be tolerated in society.

2 Example of BNS 304

Example 1: Ravi is walking on a busy street when a thief suddenly runs up to him, grabs his phone from his hand, and quickly runs away. The thief forcibly took Ravi’s phone without his consent. This is a case of snatching, where the thief committed theft by quickly and forcefully seizing the phone.

Example 2: Priya is carrying her handbag on her shoulder when a man quickly snatches it from her and runs off. She tries to hold on, but the man pulls the bag away with force. This is also snatching, where the thief uses sudden force to take away the movable property (Priya’s handbag) without her permission.

---

304 BNS Punishment

1. Imprisonment:
Under BNS Section 304, the punishment for snatching is imprisonment, which may extend up to three years.

2. Fine:
In addition to imprisonment, the offender is also liable to pay a fine. The exact amount of the fine is not specified in the section, but it serves as an additional penalty alongside imprisonment.

---

---

304 BNS bailable or not ?

BNS Section 304 specifies that snatching is a non-bailable offense. This means that the accused cannot be granted bail as a matter of right, and the decision to grant bail is left to the discretion of the court. Given the nature of the crime and its impact on public safety, the non-bailable nature ensures that the accused remains in custody until the case is heard in court.

---

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304

Points	Details
BNS Section	Section 304
Offense	Snatching (Theft by sudden or forceful seizure of property)
Punishment	Imprisonment (up to 3 years) and fine
Bailable/Non-Bailable	Non-Bailable
Cognizable/Non-Cognizable	Cognizable
Trial by	Any Magistrate

---

BNS Section 304 FAQs

---

If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.

Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process.

---