Introduction to Section 363 BNSS
Section 363 BNSS deals with the procedure for trial of persons who have already been convicted in the past for serious crimes related to coinage, stamp-law, or property. It applies when such individuals are again accused of a similar offence carrying punishment of three years or more. The section ensures stricter judicial treatment of repeat offenders, promoting better public safety. It also clarifies when the Magistrate should transfer the case to a higher court for proper justice.
What is BNSS Section 363 ?
BNSS 363 states that if a person has earlier been punished for a crime under Chapter X (coinage, stamp-law) or Chapter XVII (property crimes) for at least 3 years, and is again accused of a similar crime, the trial should usually be handled by a higher court. If any other person is jointly accused, they are also sent with the main accused unless discharged earlier. The Magistrate must ensure fair trial and justice through proper court allocation.
BNSS Section of 363 in Simple Points
1. Focus on Repeat Offenders
Section 363 is specifically meant for people who were previously convicted of crimes under Chapter X (like coinage or stamp-law offences) or Chapter XVII (property offences), and are now accused again of similar crimes. The idea is to monitor repeat offenders more strictly and escalate their cases if necessary. It brings such habitual offenders under stricter judicial scrutiny.
2. Minimum 3-Year Punishment Clause
For Section 363 to apply, the earlier conviction and the present accusation must both involve offences punishable with at least three years of imprisonment. This shows that the law targets serious, not minor, repeat offences. It avoids unnecessary burden on the higher courts for petty matters and filters in only those needing deeper judicial action.
3. Role of Magistrate and Decision-Making
The Magistrate must evaluate whether the accused likely committed the offence again. If he believes there is enough ground, he can either handle the case himself (only if he has the power and feels he can give an appropriate punishment) or transfer it. This gives the Magistrate a clear guideline on how to act when dealing with serious repeat offenders.
4. Transfer to Chief Judicial Magistrate or Session Court
If the Magistrate feels the case is too serious or that the punishment may go beyond his authority, he must send the accused to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or the Court of Session. This ensures that more serious repeat offenders get tried in higher courts that have the power to give stronger sentences. It prevents under-sentencing in major cases.
5. Joint Accused Also Sent Together
When a repeat offender is being sent to a higher court, any co-accused persons involved in the same case should also be transferred to that court. However, if those others are discharged under Section 262 or 268, they are not transferred. This avoids splitting the case between courts and ensures a single, unified trial process where needed.
363 BNSS Overview
The aim of BNSS 363 is to streamline the handling of cases involving habitual offenders in property and currency-related crimes. If a person has already been convicted once and commits a similar crime again, and the Magistrate finds strong grounds, then the case must be sent to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or Sessions Court, unless the Magistrate can handle it. This section ensures seriousness and authority in repeat cases.
BNSS Section 363 – 10 Key Points Explained
1. Focus on Repeat Offenders of Serious Crimes
BNSS Section 363 is designed to tackle individuals who have already been convicted for serious crimes related to coinage, stamp-law, or property and are again accused of similar offences. The law ensures that repeat offenders do not get away with lenient treatment. If someone was previously jailed for three or more years for such crimes and is caught again, the case needs extra scrutiny. This helps build trust in the justice system by treating repeat offences with due seriousness.
2. Chapters Applicable Under Section 363
This section specifically applies to offences under Chapter X (related to coinage and stamps) and Chapter XVII (property offences) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. These include crimes like counterfeiting currency, theft, robbery, criminal breach of trust, and similar serious economic offences. If the earlier conviction and the new offence fall under these chapters, the provision becomes applicable. The law thus filters and identifies cases that are of high economic or public concern.
3. Condition of Past Conviction and New Accusation
For BNSS Section 363 to apply, there are two essential conditions: the person must have been previously convicted and sentenced to three years or more for offences in Chapter X or XVII, and he must now be accused again of a similar offence punishable by three or more years. This safeguards genuine first-time offenders while allowing a strict process for habitual lawbreakers who threaten public safety or economic integrity.
4. Magistrate’s Duty Upon Identification
When such a person is brought before a Magistrate, and the Magistrate is convinced that there is enough ground to presume that the offence has been committed again, he must send the case to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or the Court of Session, unless he himself is legally allowed to try the case and impose a suitable punishment. This step ensures that the case is handled by a judge with sufficient authority to pass strict sentences if needed.
5. Provision for Co-Accused Individuals
If any other individuals are jointly accused along with the repeat offender in the same inquiry or trial, they too shall be committed to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or Court of Session, unless they have already been discharged under BNSS Sections 262 or 268. This ensures uniform handling of the entire group involved in the alleged offence and avoids splitting the trial unfairly between different courts.
6. Ensures Proper Court Jurisdiction for Serious Matters
The provision upholds the principle that serious cases must be tried by higher courts. It prevents Magistrates with limited powers from trying grave offences they are not authorized to sentence appropriately. By sending the case to the CJM or Sessions Court, it ensures the accused, if convicted, receives a just and proportionate sentence, promoting faith in the criminal justice system.
7. Prevents Leniency in Repeat Offence Trials
BNSS Section 363 aims to avoid situations where repeat offenders receive a light punishment due to a jurisdictional gap. Once a person is found to have previously committed a serious crime and is suspected again of a similar act, the law mandates that the trial must be held where maximum justice can be delivered. This discourages repeat criminal behavior and acts as a deterrent in the long run.
8. Balances Judicial Discretion with Public Interest
While the Magistrate has initial discretion to assess whether the offence falls under this section, once convinced, they are bound to follow the law and forward the case appropriately. This balance between judicial discretion and rule-bound procedure ensures transparency and safeguards public interest, while also maintaining fair treatment of the accused during trial.
9. Aligns with the Spirit of Fair and Strong Justice
BNSS Section 363 reflects India’s commitment to a strong legal system where repeat serious offenders are not allowed to escape justice due to technical loopholes. It also reinforces that economic offences and property-related crimes are taken seriously, particularly when committed more than once. It strengthens legal procedure without violating the rights of the accused.
10. Prevents Abuse and Ensures Accountability
Finally, the section promotes accountability in law enforcement and prosecution. It ensures that individuals with a history of serious criminal activity face the full weight of the law if they repeat such acts. It avoids misuse of lighter judicial forums and provides a structured framework for dealing with such cases through higher judicial channels, safeguarding society at large.
Example 1:
Ravi was earlier convicted for theft and served a 4-year sentence. Two years later, he is caught again for another burglary. As both crimes fall under Chapter XVII, and the punishment exceeds 3 years, the current Magistrate sends his case to the Chief Judicial Magistrate for trial.
Example 2:
Mehul, previously jailed for forgery of currency, is again accused of a similar offence. The trial Magistrate believes the punishment may go beyond his jurisdiction. Hence, he commits Mehul’s case to the Court of Session as per BNSS Section 363.
BNSS Section 363 Short Information
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Section Name | BNSS Section 363 |
| Main Focus | Deals with repeat offenders in coinage, stamp, or property-related crimes who have prior convictions of 3 years or more. |
| Magistrate’s Role | If the accused is found to be a habitual offender, the Magistrate must send the case to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or Sessions Court. |
| Applicable Chapters | Applies to offences under Chapter X (Coinage and Stamps) and Chapter XVII (Property Crimes) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. |
| Purpose | Ensures that repeat offenders face stricter and appropriate trials in higher courts, preventing lenient punishments and promoting justice. |
Why is BNSS Section 363 Needed?
BNSS Section 363 is essential to ensure habitual criminals are treated more seriously by the legal system. When someone repeats crimes of a serious nature — like forgery, theft, or coin-related offences — society expects stronger action. This section ensures such cases are not dealt with casually by junior Magistrates who may not have the authority to impose heavier punishments. It protects public trust in justice by escalating habitual offender cases to senior courts and ensures justice is not diluted in repeat crimes. It also streamlines court processes by clarifying when and how to transfer such cases.
BNSS Section 363 FAQs
BNSS 363
Conclusion
BNSS Section 363 ensures that habitual offenders who repeatedly commit property or currency-related crimes face trial in higher courts. It prevents repeat criminals from escaping with light punishment by transferring such cases to the Chief Judicial Magistrate or Sessions Court. This strengthens justice and deters repeated wrongdoing.
Need Legal Support?
If you are dealing with court cases, marriage problems, or any other legal issue, our team at Marriage Solution – Lawyer Help is here for you. Simply fill out our quick online enquiry form, and we’ll connect you with the right legal expert to support your needs .