Introduction to Section 367 BNSS
Section 367 BNSS deals with the legal procedure when an accused person is suspected to be of unsound mind during a criminal inquiry. It ensures that individuals who are mentally unfit are treated fairly in accordance with both legal standards and medical evaluations. This section highlights the importance of justice, mental health rights, and due legal care for such accused persons.
What is BNSS Section 367 ?
BNSS Section 367 provides the legal procedure to be followed when an accused person is suspected of being of unsound mind or having an intellectual disability. It ensures the accused is properly evaluated by medical professionals and protects their legal rights. The Magistrate must decide whether the accused can defend themselves, and based on medical advice, may discharge, postpone, or close the inquiry.
BNSS Section of 367 in Simple Points
1. Medical Investigation on Suspicion of Mental Illness
When a Magistrate believes that an accused person may be of unsound mind and incapable of making their defence, they are required to initiate a formal inquiry. The first step involves referring the accused to a civil surgeon or a medical officer appointed by the State Government. This ensures a medically guided start to the legal decision-making. The examining doctor must also appear before the Magistrate as a witness. This testimony is formally recorded in writing. It forms the base of further psychiatric referral. The process ensures fairness before any legal proceeding continues.
2. Psychiatric Assessment and Appeal Option
If the civil surgeon confirms the accused has mental illness, they are referred to a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist in a government medical institution. The psychiatrist evaluates whether the accused suffers from unsoundness of mind or intellectual disability. Their report is shared with the Magistrate. If the accused disagrees, they can appeal to a Medical Board. This board includes the head of a psychiatry unit and a faculty member from a nearby government medical college. This appeal mechanism protects the rights of the accused by ensuring unbiased expert review.
3. Interim Custody or Care (Section 369 Reference)
While the inquiry and medical assessments are in progress, the Magistrate can make temporary arrangements as per Section 369. These may include placing the accused in safe custody or ensuring mental health treatment is provided. These provisions prevent unnecessary hardship or injustice during the evaluation period. The law recognizes the need to safeguard both the accused and society. It also avoids unlawful detention without medical clarity. This step maintains a humane and balanced approach during pending inquiry.
4. Outcome if the Accused is Mentally Unfit
Once it is confirmed that the accused is of unsound mind, the Magistrate must determine if this mental state makes the person incapable of entering defence. If found incapable, and there’s no prima facie case, the Magistrate can discharge the accused. But if a prima facie case exists, the proceedings are postponed for a treatment period as advised by the psychiatrist. During this time, the accused is treated and managed under the guidelines of Section 369. This ensures that justice and mental health care go hand in hand.
5. Special Provision for Intellectual Disability
When the evaluation finds that the accused has an intellectual disability rather than a mental illness, the Magistrate must examine if they are fit to defend themselves. If found incapable, the inquiry is closed permanently, rather than postponed. The individual is then managed as per the provisions of Section 369. This recognizes the long-term nature of intellectual disabilities as different from curable mental illness. The provision avoids unnecessary legal stress on those who may never regain full cognitive ability. It shows the law’s compassion toward the mentally vulnerable.
367 BNSS Overview
Section 367 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 lays down the process to be followed if an accused is suspected of suffering from mental illness or intellectual disability. The Magistrate must order medical evaluation, consult psychiatric professionals, and decide whether the accused is capable of making their defence. If unfit, proceedings may be postponed, closed, or discharged depending on the medical and legal findings.
BNSS Section 367 – Explained: 10 Key Points
1. Magistrate’s Role in Identifying Mental Illness
Section 367 begins by empowering the Magistrate to act if they believe the accused person may be of unsound mind. This belief must arise during an inquiry. If such doubt exists, the Magistrate must initiate an investigation into the mental condition of the accused. This shows the importance of ensuring fair legal proceedings and that no one is tried without being mentally fit to defend themselves. The inquiry starts with a mandatory medical evaluation by the civil surgeon or a state-appointed medical officer.
2. Medical Examination by a Specialist
Once the civil surgeon suspects mental unsoundness, the case is referred to a government psychiatrist or clinical psychologist. This second layer ensures expert diagnosis and prevents misjudgment. The medical professional is required to report back to the Magistrate on whether the accused suffers from unsoundness of mind or an intellectual disability. This process ensures a scientific and standardized medical approach in legal decisions.
3. Right to Appeal Before a Medical Board
The accused has the legal right to challenge the psychiatrist’s report. If they are dissatisfied, they can appeal before a Medical Board. This board includes two senior government psychiatric professionals—one from a hospital and one from a medical college. This safeguard ensures that no one is wrongly categorized as mentally unfit, protecting both their dignity and legal rights.
4. Interim Measures Under Section 369
While medical evaluations are ongoing, the Magistrate has the authority to take temporary steps under Section 369. This may include measures for the accused’s custody or care. These interim arrangements are made to protect the accused and others, and to ensure that legal procedures are not prematurely rushed or compromised during medical evaluation.
5. Determining Capacity for Defence
If the psychiatrist confirms unsoundness of mind, the Magistrate must then decide if this condition affects the accused’s ability to defend themselves. This legal question is separate from the medical one. If the accused is mentally unfit to understand proceedings or consult with a lawyer, they are considered incapable of defence. The Magistrate must make a formal record of this finding.
6. Discharge if No Prima Facie Case Exists
If the accused is incapable of defence and the evidence shows no strong case against them, the Magistrate can discharge the accused without proceeding further. This is done without questioning the accused but after reviewing all prosecution material and hearing the accused’s advocate. The focus is on avoiding unnecessary legal proceedings against someone who is not guilty and also mentally unfit.
7. Postponement if Prima Facie Case Exists
However, if a prima facie case is established against an accused who is mentally unfit, the Magistrate must postpone the trial. The postponement period is based on the treatment duration advised by the psychiatrist. During this time, the accused is to be dealt with under Section 369, which covers procedures for care, treatment, and legal handling of such individuals.
8. Special Procedure for Intellectual Disability
If the mental evaluation reveals intellectual disability (not temporary unsoundness), a different approach is followed. The Magistrate must again assess whether this disability prevents the accused from entering defence. If yes, the inquiry is closed permanently, recognizing that the accused is not in a condition to participate in trial at all. The individual is then dealt with as per Section 369 provisions.
9. Balancing Justice and Mental Health Rights
This section shows a sensitive and balanced approach toward mental health in criminal law. It aims to ensure that mentally unfit individuals are not subjected to unfair trials. At the same time, it ensures that genuine cases of crime are not dismissed without proper evidence evaluation. Section 367 helps the judiciary make informed and humane decisions in such complex cases.
10. Legal and Ethical Safeguards
Overall, BNSS Section 367 provides strong legal safeguards for accused persons of unsound mind. It brings in medical expertise, appeal mechanisms, and judicial discretion. This section respects the human rights of mentally ill individuals while maintaining the integrity of the criminal justice system. It is a significant step towards making Indian criminal law more inclusive, fair, and medically sound.
Example 1:
An accused starts behaving irrationally in court during an inquiry. The Magistrate suspects mental illness and refers the case to a civil surgeon. After psychiatric evaluation confirms schizophrenia, the court postpones the trial under Section 369 until treatment is complete.
Example 2:
A person with a documented case of intellectual disability is accused of minor theft. Psychiatric experts confirm they are incapable of understanding court proceedings. The Magistrate finds no strong evidence and discharges the accused under Section 367(4).
BNSS Section 367 Short Information
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Section Name | BNSS Section 367 |
| Main Rule | If the accused appears mentally ill or intellectually disabled, the Magistrate must order medical evaluation to check fitness for trial. |
| Medical & Legal Process | Civil surgeon and psychiatrist examine the accused. If found unfit, the Magistrate decides whether to postpone or discharge the case. |
| Right to Appeal | The accused can challenge the psychiatrist’s report before a Medical Board consisting of senior government psychiatric experts. |
| Purpose | Ensures fair trial by protecting the rights of mentally ill persons and preventing unfair proceedings against unfit accused. |
Why is BNSS Section 367 Needed?
BNSS Section 367 is essential to protect the rights of accused persons who are mentally ill or intellectually disabled. It ensures that such individuals are not forced to face legal proceedings they cannot understand or participate in. Without this provision, people with mental health conditions might be unfairly tried or imprisoned. This section bridges the gap between medical reality and legal procedure, making the justice system more humane and just. It also provides clear guidelines for Magistrates to act responsibly and legally. With increasing mental health awareness, this provision aligns the Indian legal system with international human rights standards. It prevents misuse of law and ensures justice is served with dignity and care.
BNSS Section 367 FAQs
BNSS 367
Conclusion
BNSS Section 367 ensures that people with mental illness or intellectual disabilities are treated fairly in criminal trials. The court must verify their mental condition, seek expert medical opinions, and only proceed if they are mentally fit to defend themselves. This section balances justice with compassion and medical accuracy.
Need Legal Support?
If you are dealing with court cases, marriage problems, or any other legal issue, our team at Marriage Solution – Lawyer Help is here for you. Simply fill out our quick online enquiry form, and we’ll connect you with the right legal expert to support your needs .