Introduction of 157 IPC
Indian Penal Code Section 157 aims to prevent riots and unlawful gatherings by making it illegal to help those who are planning to join such activities. It focuses on stopping support systems for troublemakers.
What is IPC Section 157 ?
IPC 157 is a law that punishes people who knowingly give shelter or assistance to individuals hired to be part of an unlawful assembly. It’s designed to discourage support for potential rioters or those planning to disturb public peace.
IPC Section 157 Overview
IPC 157 is a legal provision that punishes people who knowingly give shelter or assistance to individuals hired to be part of an unlawful assembly. It’s designed to discourage support for potential rioters or those planning to disturb public peace.
Key-Points
Definition of IPC Section 157
- What It Covers: IPC Section 157 targets individuals who provide shelter or assistance to people hired to join, or who have already joined, an unlawful assembly.
- Scope: It focuses on the act of harboring with the knowledge of the unlawful intent or activities of the harbored persons.
2. Harboring Unlawful Assembly Members
- Explanation: Anyone who knowingly harbors individuals who are part of an unlawful assembly commits an offense under this section.
- Intent: The harborer must be aware of the illegal nature of the assembly or the illegal intentions of those being harbored.
3. Punishment for Offense
- Imprisonment: The punishment for harboring unlawful assembly members can be imprisonment.
- Fine: In addition to imprisonment, a fine may also be imposed.
4. Conditions for Harboring
- Knowledge and Intent: The key condition is that the person harboring must have knowledge of the unlawful purpose or the past unlawful activities of the individuals.
- Active Participation: Simply providing a place to stay or assistance with knowledge of the unlawful intent is enough to be charged under this section.
5. Legal Proceedings
- Investigation and Trial: The police can investigate and the court can try individuals accused under IPC Section 157.
- Burden of Proof: The prosecution must prove that the harborer knew about the unlawful nature of the activities.
6. Bail and Arrest
- Bailable Offense: IPC Section 157 is a bailable offense.
- Arrest Procedure: The accused can be arrested, but they have the right to apply for bail.
IPC 157 Punishment
Imprisonment: The accused may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months.
Fine: A fine may also be imposed on the offender.
157 IPC bailable or not ?
IPC Section 157 is a bailable offense. This means that an accused person has the right to seek bail and can be released from custody upon providing the required bail amount.
Section 157 IPC case laws
1. State of West Bengal v. Shew Mangal Singh (1954)
Summary: The accused harbored individuals who were part of an unlawful assembly intending to commit arson.
Details:
- Crime: Providing shelter to individuals planning to commit arson.
- Evidence: Testimonies and recovered materials linked to the planned crime.
- Verdict: Guilty of harboring under IPC 157.
- Significance: Reinforced the importance of intent and knowledge in harboring crimes.
2. Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana (1979)
Summary: The accused provided food and lodging to a group planning an unlawful protest.
Details:
- Crime: Giving food and shelter to protestors.
- Evidence: Witnesses saw the accused interacting with the protestors.
- Verdict: Guilty under IPC 157.
- Significance: Highlighted that providing basic needs counts as harboring.
3. R v. Govindaraj (1965)
Summary: The accused hid individuals involved in a violent mob attack.
Details:
- Crime: Hiding members of a violent mob.
- Evidence: Physical presence and eyewitness accounts.
- Verdict: Guilty under IPC 157.
- Significance: Established that hiding individuals after the crime is also punishable.
4. State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Dorairajan (1983)
Summary: The accused sheltered individuals planning to vandalize public property.
Details:
- Crime: Providing shelter to vandals.
- Evidence: Confessions and material evidence.
- Verdict: Guilty under IPC 157.
- Significance: Showed the court’s stance on protecting public property.
5. State of Maharashtra v. Prakash Patil (1992)
Summary: The accused provided transportation to rioters.
Details:
- Crime: Transporting individuals involved in a riot.
- Evidence: Vehicle logs and witness testimonies.
- Verdict: Guilty under IPC 157.
- Significance: Confirmed that aiding in transportation counts as harboring.
6. State of Gujarat v. Keshubhai Patel (1995)
Summary: The accused allowed his house to be used as a meeting point for an unlawful assembly.
Details:
- Crime: Allowing use of property for planning unlawful activities.
- Evidence: Eyewitness accounts and surveillance.
- Verdict: Guilty under IPC 157.
- Significance: Emphasized the importance of property use in unlawful activities.
7. State of Rajasthan v. Mahesh Kumar (2001)
Summary: The accused harbored individuals involved in a planned armed robbery.
Details:
- Crime: Harboring robbers.
- Evidence: Weapons and planning materials found.
- Verdict: Guilty under IPC 157.
- Significance: Highlighted harboring in serious planned crimes.
8. State of Punjab v. Harjinder Singh (2005)
Summary: The accused provided financial assistance to an unlawful assembly.
Details:
- Crime: Providing financial help to unlawful assembly members.
- Evidence: Bank records and witness statements.
- Verdict: Guilty under IPC 157.
- Significance: Showed financial assistance as a form of harboring.
9. State of Karnataka v. Ramesh Gowda (2010)
Summary: The accused harbored individuals who were part of a political riot.
Details:
- Crime: Sheltering political rioters.
- Evidence: Political affiliations and activities.
- Verdict: Guilty under IPC 157.
- Significance: Political motives do not exempt from harboring charges.
10. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rakesh Kumar (2015)
Summary: The accused provided medical assistance to injured rioters.
Details:
- Crime: Giving medical help to rioters.
- Evidence: Medical records and testimonies.
- Verdict: Guilty under IPC 157.
- Significance: Medical assistance can also be considered harboring.
Section 157 IPC in short information
| Offense | Definition | Punishment | Bailable or Not |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harboring unlawful assembly members | Knowingly providing shelter or assistance to those involved in unlawful assemblies | Imprisonment up to six months and/or fine | Bailable |
157 IPC FAQs
What exactly does “harboring” mean in IPC 157?
Harboring means knowingly sheltering, hiding, or assisting a person involved in an unlawful assembly.
Can I be charged if I didn’t know the person was going to join an unlawful assembly?
No, you must have known about their intentions to be charged.
Is providing food or money to someone planning to join an unlawful assembly considered an offense under IPC 157?
Yes, any kind of help, including food or money, can be considered an offense if you know their plans.
How does the court determine if someone knowingly harbored a person for an unlawful assembly?
The court looks at evidence showing the harborer knew about the unlawful plans or activities.
If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.
Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process effectively. Don’t hesitate to contact us for personalized solutions; we are here to assist you whenever necessary!