MarriageSolution.in: Reliable Legal Partner


Introduction of 177 IPC

Section 177 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) deals with the act of intentionally providing false information to a public servant when legally required to provide truthful details. This section aims to ensure that public servants, responsible for maintaining law and order, receive accurate information to perform their duties effectively. Falsifying information undermines justice, administrative efficiency, and public trust, and is therefore penalized under this law.



What is IPC Section 177 ?

IPC 177 pertains to providing false information to public servants. It punishes individuals who are legally bound to furnish truthful information but knowingly provide false details. The section aims to maintain the accuracy of information in administrative and legal matters, ensuring smooth functioning of government processes. The punishment depends on the severity and nature of the false information, especially if it pertains to crimes or offenders.


IPC 177 in Simple Points

1. Legal Obligation to Provide True Information

Every individual has a legal duty to provide truthful and accurate information when required by law. This includes situations like filing tax returns, reporting accidents, or responding to inquiries during investigations. When someone knowingly gives false information, it violates this obligation and disrupts the process of justice or administration. For instance, if a witness intentionally lies in a police statement, they are punishable under IPC 177.

2. Punishment for Furnishing False Information

If someone knowingly provides false information to a public servant, they face the following punishments:

  • Simple imprisonment for up to six months,
  • A fine of up to ₹1,000, or
  • Both.
    This penalty applies when the false information does not directly involve a criminal offense. The punishment serves as a deterrent, ensuring individuals take their responsibility to provide accurate information seriously.

3. Enhanced Punishment for False Information About Crimes

When the false information relates to:

  • The commission of a criminal offense,
  • Preventing the commission of a crime, or
  • Apprehending an offender,
    the punishment is more severe. In such cases, the person can face:
  • Imprisonment for up to two years,
  • A fine, or
  • Both.
    This ensures that individuals cannot obstruct justice or mislead authorities during criminal investigations.

4. Illustrations Provided in the Law

To clarify its application, IPC 177 includes practical examples:

  • If a person, knowing about a murder, falsely reports that the death occurred due to an accident, they are guilty under IPC 177.
  • A village watchman, tasked with reporting suspicious activities, deliberately misguides the police about a planned robbery. In both cases, the false information hinders justice, and the individuals are punishable for their actions.

5. Non-Cognizable and Bailable Offense

Offenses under IPC 177 are categorized as:

  • Non-cognizable: Police cannot arrest or investigate the offender without prior permission from a magistrate.
  • Bailable: The accused has the right to obtain bail.
    This classification ensures that minor offenses under IPC 177 do not lead to undue harassment while still holding individuals accountable for their misconduct. It balances the protection of personal freedoms with the enforcement of the law.

Section 177 IPC Overview

10 Key Points of IPC 177: Furnishing False Information

1. Legal Obligation to Provide True Information

Individuals are legally bound to provide accurate and truthful information to public servants when required. This obligation ensures that administrative and legal processes function efficiently. If someone deliberately provides false information, they disrupt the system, which can have serious consequences. For example, withholding accurate data during a census or misreporting financial details to authorities can lead to penalties under IPC 177.

2. Consequences of Providing False Information

If a person knowingly furnishes false information that they are legally required to give, they can be punished with:

  • Simple imprisonment of up to six months,
  • A fine of up to ₹1,000, or
  • Both imprisonment and fine.
    This ensures accountability and discourages falsehoods that can mislead public servants and cause administrative delays.

3. Severe Punishment for False Information About Crimes

When the false information concerns the commission of a crime, prevention of a crime, or apprehension of an offender, the punishment becomes stricter:

  • Imprisonment of either description (simple or rigorous) for up to two years,
  • A fine, or
  • Both.
    This provision emphasizes the seriousness of obstructing justice by misinforming authorities about criminal activities.

4. Illustrative Example: Misreporting a Murder

The law includes illustrative examples to clarify its application. For instance, if someone witnesses a murder but informs the magistrate that the death occurred due to a snake bite, they are guilty under IPC 177. Such actions aim to protect the offender and obstruct justice, making the individual liable for punishment.

5. Illustrative Example: Misleading About Dacoity

Another example provided in IPC 177 involves a village watchman who deliberately provides false information about a group planning a dacoity. If this misleads the police and diverts their resources, it qualifies as an offense under this section. The inclusion of examples ensures clear understanding and discourages such misconduct.

6. Definition of “Offense” Under IPC 177

The term “offense” in IPC 177 includes certain crimes committed outside India, provided those crimes would be punishable under Indian law. For example, acts like murder, robbery, or dacoity committed abroad can still invoke IPC 177 if false information is furnished about them. This expands the law’s jurisdiction and applicability in global scenarios.

7. Focus on Intention Behind the Act

A crucial aspect of IPC 177 is the intention of the person furnishing false information. It must be proven that the individual knowingly or deliberately provided false details. Unintentional errors or mistakes due to lack of knowledge do not fall under this section, which is designed to penalize willful deception.

8. Protecting Law and Order

IPC 177 serves as a safeguard for law enforcement agencies and administrative bodies. By ensuring that public servants receive accurate information, it promotes efficient governance and helps maintain law and order. False information can delay justice, waste resources, and harm public trust, making this law a critical tool in preventing such issues.

9. Punishment Ensures Accountability

The law imposes different levels of punishment depending on the severity of the false information. For minor falsehoods, the punishment is moderate, but for cases involving crimes or offenders, it is stringent. This graded approach ensures fairness while holding individuals accountable for their actions.

10. Non-Cognizable and Bailable Nature

Offenses under IPC 177 are categorized as:

  • Non-cognizable: Police require prior approval from a magistrate to arrest or investigate.
  • Bailable: The accused can secure bail as a matter of right.
    These provisions balance the enforcement of the law while safeguarding individual freedoms, ensuring that minor offenses do not lead to excessive harassment.

Section 177 IPC case laws

1. Case: State of Karnataka vs Raju

Facts: The accused provided false information about a theft incident to the police, claiming the theft was committed by a rival. Investigations revealed that the information was intentionally fabricated.
Result: The court held the accused guilty under IPC 177. He was sentenced to a fine of ₹1,000 and simple imprisonment for 3 months. The court emphasized the importance of truthful reporting to public servants.

2. Case: Ram Narayan vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Facts: A landowner falsely claimed that his tenant had committed arson to evict the tenant from the property. The police later found the information to be baseless and intended to harass the tenant.
Result: The accused was convicted under IPC 177 and fined ₹500. The court ruled that misuse of legal processes through false information harms justice and public trust.

3. Case: Mohan Lal vs State of Rajasthan

Facts: A village headman misinformed the police about the identity of robbers involved in a dacoity case to shield his relatives. His false statement led to the arrest of innocent individuals.
Result: The court convicted the headman under IPC 177 and imposed imprisonment of 6 months along with a fine of ₹1,000. The court stressed that furnishing false information compromises legal proceedings.

4. Case: State of Tamil Nadu vs S. Ramesh

Facts: The accused falsely reported the location of stolen goods to mislead the police during an investigation. This led to delays in solving the case.
Result: The court found the accused guilty under IPC 177 and imposed a fine of ₹2,000. The judgment highlighted the consequences of obstructing public servants in their duties through false information.

5. Case: Kamla Devi vs State of Haryana

Facts: A person knowingly provided false information about the whereabouts of a murder suspect to the police, causing unnecessary delays in the apprehension of the actual culprit.
Result: The court held the accused guilty under IPC 177 and imposed a sentence of simple imprisonment for 2 months. The court noted that false information in serious crimes like murder could severely disrupt justice.


177 IPC Punishment

The punishment under IPC 177 varies based on the nature of the false information:

  1. For general false information:
    • Imprisonment: Up to 6 months (simple imprisonment).
    • Fine: Up to ₹1,000.
    • Both imprisonment and fine can be imposed.
  2. For false information related to crimes or offenders:
    • Imprisonment: Up to 2 years (simple or rigorous).
    • Fine: As determined by the court.
    • Both imprisonment and fine can be imposed.

IPC 177 bailable or not ?

Yes, IPC 177 is a bailable offense. This means the accused has the legal right to seek bail, and it is typically granted by the court or the police without delay.


Section 177 IPC in short information

IPC SectionOffensePunishmentBailable/Non-BailableCognizable/Non-CognizableTrial By
177Furnishing false information to a public servant– Up to 6 months imprisonment or ₹1,000 fine or both.
– For crime-related false info: Up to 2 years imprisonment or fine or both.
BailableNon-CognizableMagistrate

IPC Section 177 FAQs

1. What is the main purpose of IPC 177?

2. What is the punishment under IPC 177?

3. Is IPC 177 bailable?

Yes, offenses under IPC 177 are bailable, meaning the accused can secure bail as a matter of right.

4. Is IPC 177 a cognizable offense?

5. How does IPC 177 protect public servants?


Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole