192 IPC

---

Introduction of 192 IPC

192 IPC deals with fabricating false evidence, which means creating or changing proof to mislead the court, police, or any legal authority. This crime happens when a person intentionally makes fake documents, plants false evidence, or manipulates facts to influence a legal case. The purpose is to wrongly convict an innocent person or help a guilty person escape punishment. IPC 192 is a serious offense because it affects the justice system and can lead to wrongful decisions in court. That’s why the law provides strict punishment for those who fabricate false evidence.

---

---

What is IPC Section 192 ?

IPC 192 is a crucial law that protects the justice system from false evidence. Fabricating false evidence is a serious crime because it can wrongfully punish innocent people or help criminals escape punishment. Courts impose strict punishments to discourage such acts and ensure fairness in legal proceedings.

---

IPC 192 in Simple Points

1. Meaning of Fabricating False Evidence

Fabricating false evidence means intentionally creating, altering, or presenting fake proof in a legal case. This includes forging documents, planting false evidence, or making fake witness statements. The goal is to mislead the court, police, or any public authority. For example, if someone fakes medical reports to falsely prove an injury, it is a violation of IPC 192.

2. Difference Between False Evidence and Fabricated Evidence

There is a difference between giving false evidence (IPC 191) and fabricating false evidence (IPC 192). IPC 191 punishes those who lie under oath, whereas IPC 192 applies to those who create fake proof. For example, if a witness lies in court, it falls under IPC 191, but if someone creates a fake witness statement, it falls under IPC 192.

3. Punishment for Fabricating False Evidence

The punishment for fabricating false evidence depends on where the false evidence is used:

• If it is used in any general case, the punishment is up to 7 years in prison and a fine.
• If the fabricated evidence is used in a case where the death penalty or life imprisonment could be given, the punishment increases to up to 10 years in prison and a fine.

4. Why IPC 192 is a Serious Crime

Fabricating false evidence is dangerous because it can cause wrongful convictions or help guilty people escape punishment. It wastes the court’s time, misleads judges, and damages trust in the legal system. If false evidence is accepted, innocent people may be jailed, and criminals may go free. That’s why the law punishes those who create fake evidence strictly.

5. Real-Life Impact of IPC 192

Many cases have shown how fabricating evidence affects justice. In some cases, people have falsely accused others using fake documents, while in others, criminals have planted fake evidence to frame innocent people. Courts now use forensic science, digital verification, and expert analysis to check whether the evidence is real or fake. This helps reduce misuse of the law.

---

Section 192 IPC Overview

IPC 192 deals with the act of fabricating false evidence. This means a person creates or manipulates evidence in such a way that it misleads the court, police, or any legal authority. The person intends to influence the outcome of a case unfairly. If proven guilty, the accused can face imprisonment and/or a fine.

10 Key Points on IPC 192: Fabricating False Evidence

1. Meaning of Fabricating False Evidence

Fabricating false evidence means deliberately creating, altering, or presenting false proof in a legal case. It is different from merely lying because, under IPC 192, the person actively manipulates evidence. For example, forging a signature on a legal contract or creating fake medical records to support a false claim is punishable under this section.

2. Legal Obligation and Intent

To be charged under IPC 192, a person must have knowingly and intentionally fabricated evidence. The accused must create false proof with the aim of deceiving a court, public servant, or investigation. If a person accidentally provides incorrect information without intending to mislead, it does not fall under IPC 192. The section applies only when there is a clear intention to mislead the legal process.

3. Forms of Fabricated Evidence

Fabricated false evidence can take various forms, including:

• Document Forgery – Creating fake contracts, wills, property papers, or identity documents.
• False Witness Statements – Persuading someone to give false testimony in court.
• Planted Evidence – Placing fake weapons, drugs, or other items to frame someone.
• Medical Fraud – Producing fake medical certificates or reports in court cases.
• Tampered Digital Evidence – Modifying CCTV footage, emails, or phone records.

4. Impact on Justice System

Fabricating false evidence is a serious crime because it destroys trust in the legal system. If false evidence is accepted, innocent people may be punished, while guilty individuals escape. It wastes judicial time and resources and leads to wrongful convictions or acquittals. That’s why IPC 192 ensures strict punishment to prevent people from misusing the justice system.

5. Difference Between IPC 191 and IPC 192

IPC 191 deals with giving false evidence (lying under oath), while IPC 192 deals with fabricating false evidence (creating false proof). The key difference is that:

• IPC 191 applies when a person verbally lies in court.
• IPC 192 applies when a person creates or alters false evidence to deceive the court.
  For example, if a witness falsely testifies in court, it is IPC 191. But if a person creates a fake witness statement, it is IPC 192.

6. Punishment for Fabricating False Evidence

Under IPC 192, the punishment varies based on the impact of the false evidence:

• If the fabricated evidence is used in a general legal case, the punishment is up to 7 years of imprisonment and a fine.
• If the fabricated evidence is used in a case where the death penalty or life imprisonment could be given, the punishment is up to 10 years of imprisonment and a fine.
  The court considers the seriousness of the false evidence and its effect on justice before deciding the punishment.

7. Cognizable and Non-Bailable Offense

IPC 192 is a non-bailable and cognizable offense, meaning:

• The police can arrest the accused without a warrant.
• The accused does not have the automatic right to bail. The court decides whether bail should be granted.
  This strict provision ensures that people do not misuse legal procedures to frame others or mislead courts.

8. Famous Case Laws on IPC 192

Several judgments highlight the importance of IPC 192:

1. Queen v. Gopal Singh (1881) – The accused was convicted for forging a will to claim property fraudulently.
2. State v. Rajendra (2012) – A person planted a fake weapon at a crime scene, misleading the police. He was convicted under IPC 192.
3. Nand Kumar v. State of Rajasthan (2006) – The accused forged medical documents to claim false insurance compensation. The court ruled it as fabricating false evidence under IPC 192.
   These cases show how forging or tampering with evidence is a serious offense with strict punishment.

9. Role of Technology in IPC 192 Cases With advanced technology, new forms of fabricated evidence have emerged:

• Deepfake Videos – Altering video footage to make it appear as if someone committed a crime.
• Fake Emails and Chats – Creating false digital conversations to prove a point in court.
• Tampered CCTV Footage – Editing or deleting parts of security footage to mislead investigations.
  Due to such developments, courts now accept forensic and cyber evidence to verify whether the submitted proof is genuine or fabricated.

10. Preventive Measures Against Fabrication of Evidence

To prevent misuse of IPC 192, strict legal checks and forensic verification are necessary. Some important measures include:

• Using digital signatures and blockchain for document verification.
• Cross-checking witness statements with independent evidence.
• Applying forensic science to test the authenticity of documents, audio, and video files.
• Strict punishment for those involved in fabricating false evidence, including lawyers, police officers, or public officials.
  These steps help maintain the integrity of the justice system and prevent wrongful convictions.

2 Examples of IPC 192 Cases

Example 1: Fake Medical Report for Insurance Fraud

A person meets with a minor accident but fakes a serious injury using a false medical certificate to claim insurance money. The doctor who issues the fake report is also involved in the fraud. Since the medical report is fabricated evidence, both the person and the doctor can be punished under IPC 192.

Example 2: False Witness Statement in a Court Case

A person falsely claims to be a witness to a crime and submits a fake statement in court to help a guilty person escape punishment. The person creating the false statement and those who present it as true are guilty of fabricating false evidence and can be punished under IPC 192.

---

192 IPC Punishment

1. Imprisonment: If a person fabricates false evidence for a general case, they can be punished with imprisonment of up to 7 years. However, if the false evidence is used in a case where the death penalty or life imprisonment could be given, the punishment increases to up to 10 years of imprisonment.
2. Fine: In addition to imprisonment, the offender may also be liable to pay a fine, which is decided by the court based on the seriousness of the offense and its impact on justice.

---

192 IPC Bailable or non bailable

• IPC 192 is a non-bailable offense, meaning the accused cannot get bail as a right and must apply for bail in court.
• Whether bail is granted depends on the seriousness of the fabricated evidence and its effect on justice.
• If the fabricated evidence could lead to a death sentence or life imprisonment for someone else, the chances of getting bail are lower.

---

Section 192 IPC case laws

1. Emperor v. Bhatu Sadu (1924)

Case Summary:
In this case, the accused created false evidence by forging documents to support a land ownership claim in court. The accused presented these fake documents to mislead the judge and prove that he owned a disputed piece of land.

Court Decision:
The court found that the accused had deliberately fabricated false evidence to manipulate the judicial process. He was convicted under IPC 192 and sentenced to imprisonment and a fine. This case confirmed that anyone who fakes legal documents to mislead the court is guilty under IPC 192.

2. Queen-Empress v. Ramayya (1895)

Case Summary:
A person planted fake fingerprints at a crime scene to falsely accuse someone else of theft. The accused wanted the police to believe that an innocent person had committed the crime.

Court Decision:
The court ruled that planting fake evidence to wrongly implicate another person is a serious offense. The accused was punished under IPC 192 because the fake fingerprints were meant to deceive the police and legal system.

3. R. Dinesh Kumar v. State of Tamil Nadu (2013)

Case Summary:
The accused was a government official who fabricated false financial records to show that public funds were used for official projects. In reality, the money was misused for personal benefit. The false financial records were created to mislead the audit department and avoid detection.

Court Decision:
The court ruled that creating fake government records is a serious crime under IPC 192. The accused was sentenced to imprisonment and a heavy fine. This case highlighted that fabricating false evidence in financial matters is equally punishable under IPC 192.

4. State of Maharashtra v. Narsingrao Gangaram Pimple (1984)

Case Summary:
A police officer forced a witness to sign a false statement that was used to convict an innocent person. The witness later revealed that he was pressured to give false testimony.

Court Decision:
The Supreme Court held that forcing someone to create false evidence is punishable under IPC 192. The police officer was convicted, proving that even law enforcement officials can be punished for fabricating evidence.

5. Mahesh Tiwari v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2009)

Case Summary:
The accused submitted a fake medical certificate to delay a court trial. He claimed that he was too sick to attend the hearing, but later it was proved that the certificate was fraudulent.

Court Decision:
The court ruled that producing fake medical reports to mislead the judiciary falls under IPC 192. The accused was fined and sentenced to imprisonment. This case clarified that even small acts of false evidence, if used to delay justice, are punishable.

---

Section 192 IPC in short information

IPC Section	Offense	Punishment	Bailable/Non-Bailable	Cognizable/Non-Cognizable	Trial By
IPC 192	Fabricating false evidence	Up to 7 years imprisonment + fine, or 10 years if used in serious cases	Non-Bailable	Cognizable	Sessions Court

---

IPC Section 192 FAQs

---

If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.

Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process.

---