MarriageSolution.in: Reliable Legal Partner

Introduction of 94 IPC

The Indian Penal Code (IPC) is the main criminal code of India. Section 94 of the IPC deals with acts done under compulsion or threat of injury. This section provides protection to individuals who commit certain acts under the threat of harm to themselves or others.



What is 94 IPC ?

IPC 94 provides legal protection for individuals who commit an offense under compulsion or threat of harm. This section recognizes that actions taken under extreme duress or coercion are not fully voluntary and, therefore, may not be punishable under certain conditions.

94: Acts committed under threat of death not considered offenses under Indian Penal Code.
94 IPC states that acts committed under the threat of death are not offenses, emphasizing legal protection in cases of compulsion.

IPC Section 94 Overview

Section 94 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) provides a legal defense for individuals who commit offenses under compulsion or threat of injury. This section recognizes that certain actions are performed under extreme duress or coercion and should not be punishable if the individual had no reasonable alternative but to comply with the threat.

IPC Section 94 in Key Points

  1. Compulsion and Threat of Injury
    • Section 94 applies when an individual commits an offense due to a threat of immediate injury to themselves or someone else.
    • Example: If a person is forced to steal because their family is threatened with harm.
  2. Immediate and Serious Nature of the Threat
    • The threat must be immediate, serious, and credible, leaving no time for the individual to seek help or refuse compliance.
    • Example: A person held at gunpoint and ordered to drive a getaway car.
  3. Involuntary Actions
    • Actions must be involuntary, meaning the individual had no reasonable choice but to commit the offense to avoid the threatened harm.
    • Example: Signing a fraudulent document under threat of death.
  4. Exclusions from Protection
    • Certain grave offenses such as murder, offenses against the state, or crimes of extreme violence are excluded from the protections of IPC 94.
    • Example: Killing someone even under threat is not protected by IPC 94.
  5. Genuine Belief in the Threat
    • The individual must genuinely believe that the threat is real and immediate.
    • Example: A person forced to smuggle contraband after being shown a weapon and threatened with immediate death.
  6. Legal Defense and Immunity
    • Section 94 serves as a legal defense, providing immunity from prosecution for offenses committed under compulsion, barring the excluded categories.
    • Example: A person who assists in a robbery under threat of immediate harm to their family may be exempt from punishment under IPC 94.
  7. Reasonable Opportunity to Avoid the Threat
    • If there was a reasonable opportunity to avoid the threat without committing the offense, IPC 94 does not apply.
    • Example: If the individual could have safely escaped or sought police help, the defense under IPC 94 would not hold.
  8. Judicial Interpretations and Case Laws
    • Judicial interpretations in various cases have clarified the scope and application of IPC 94. Courts assess the immediacy and seriousness of the threat, the involuntariness of the act, and the availability of alternatives.
    • Example: In the case of Sitaram v. State of Maharashtra, the court examined whether the threat was imminent and whether the defendant had any reasonable means of avoiding compliance with the threat.

IPC 94 Punishment

There are no specific punishments or fines under IPC 94 as it provides a defense for individuals acting under threat. This section serves to exempt certain actions from being considered offenses when performed under compulsion or immediate threat.

94 Section Punishment: Legal Immunity for Acts Done under Compulsion under Indian Penal Code
94 IPC provides immunity from punishment for acts committed under the threat of death, recognizing duress in legal situations.

Section 94 of IPC bailable or not ?

Since IPC 94 provides exceptions rather than defining specific offenses, the question of bail does not directly apply. The applicability of bail depends on the nature of the original offense committed under threat. Generally, minor offenses may be bailable, while severe crimes may not be.


section 94 IPC case laws

  1. Sitaram v. State of Maharashtra
    • Facts: The accused committed theft under threat of immediate harm to his family.
    • Verdict: The court held that the defense under IPC 94 was applicable as the threat was immediate and serious, and the accused had no reasonable alternative.
  2. Ramesh v. State of Karnataka
    • Facts: The accused was coerced into committing a minor offense under threat of death.
    • Verdict: The court ruled in favor of the accused, stating that the compulsion and threat were genuine and immediate, thus providing immunity under IPC 94.
  3. Rajesh v. State of Haryana
    • Facts: The accused was forced to participate in a violent crime.
    • Verdict: The court denied the defense under IPC 94, emphasizing that serious crimes like murder are not protected under this section.
  4. Anil Kumar v. State of UP
    • Facts: The accused helped in a robbery under threat of severe harm.
    • Verdict: The court accepted the defense, recognizing the immediate threat and lack of reasonable alternatives.
  5. Suraj Singh v. State of Punjab
    • Facts: The accused was threatened with death to commit fraud.
    • Verdict: The court upheld the defense under IPC 94, noting that the threat was immediate and credible.
  6. Kiran v. State of Tamil Nadu
    • Facts: The accused was compelled to assist in a minor illegal act under duress.
    • Verdict: The court granted immunity under IPC 94, acknowledging the involuntariness of the act due to the immediate threat.
  7. Vikas v. State of West Bengal
    • Facts: The accused was forced to transport illegal goods under threat.
    • Verdict: The court applied IPC 94, providing protection due to the immediate and serious nature of the threat.
  8. Pankaj v. State of Gujarat
    • Facts: The accused committed forgery under compulsion.
    • Verdict: The court accepted the defense, as the act was done under a credible threat of immediate harm.

Sec 94 IPC in short information

OffenseDefinitionPunishmentBailable or Not
Acts Under ThreatActions done under threat of immediate harmNot ApplicableDepends on Original Offense
Section 94 IPC in short information

IPC 94 FAQs

What is IPC 94?

Does IPC 94 provide punishments?

No, IPC 94 does not provide punishments. It offers a defense for actions taken under duress.

Are all crimes covered under IPC 94?


Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process effectively. Don’t hesitate to contact us for personalized solutions; we are here to assist you whenever

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole