MarriageSolution.in: Reliable Legal Partner


Introduction of IPC 104

IPC Section 104 is a crucial provision that allows individuals to use reasonable force to protect their movable property from unlawful attack or dispossession. It recognizes the importance of safeguarding personal property and grants legal rights to use force in specific circumstances.



What is IPC Section 104 ?

IPC 104 permits a person to use reasonable force to defend their movable property from unlawful attack or to recover possession of that movable property from someone who has taken it away unlawfully. It outlines the legal bounds within which such defense can be exercised.

 IPC 104 explaine
IPC 104 covers the right of private defense against theft, mischief, or criminal trespass, outlining legal protection for property defense.

IPC Section 104 Overview

IPC 104 allows individuals to use fair force to protect their belongings from illegal attacks or to retrieve them from someone who unlawfully took them. It sets rules for how this defense can be carried out within the law.

IPC 104 – KeyPoints

  1. Defense of Movable Property: This section deals with the right to use reasonable force to defend one’s movable property against unlawful attack or attempts to dispossess the property.
  2. Reasonable Force Permitted: The section allows the use of reasonable force, which is proportionate to the situation, to prevent unlawful attack or regain possession of movable property.
  3. Fear of Assault: If there is a reasonable apprehension of assault or criminal force being used against the person defending the movable property, the use of reasonable force is justified.
  4. Property Recovery: The section covers scenarios where reasonable force is used to recover possession of movable property that has been taken away or dispossessed unlawfully.
  5. Public Servant Protection: The use of force against public servants acting lawfully in their official capacity is not permitted under this section.
  6. Mistake of Fact: The court may consider genuine mistakes of fact that led the person to believe they were using reasonable force as a mitigating factor.
  7. Immovable Property Exclusion: The defense under this section is specific to movable property and does not cover the defense of immovable property like land or buildings.
  8. Limits on Force: While reasonable force is permitted, the use of excessive or disproportionate force that goes beyond what is necessary for defense can attract punishments under other IPC sections.

IPC 104 Punishment

There is no direct punishment specified under IPC 104 It provides legal justification for using reasonable force in defense of movable property Any excess force may attract punishments under other relevant IPC sections.

IPC 104 punishment details for private defense against property offenses under Indian Penal Code
IPC 104 outlines the right of private defense against property offenses, providing legal protection while preventing excessive force.

104 IPC bailable or not ?

As IPC 104 does not define any offense, the question of bail does not arise. It serves as an exception or legal justification for actions taken in defense of movable property within reasonable bounds.


Section 104 IPC case laws

Case Laws :

  1. Sita Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1979): The court held that the degree of force used must be proportionate to the threat and necessary for defense of movable property.
  2. Munshi Ram v. Delhi Administration (1968): This case established that the defense under Section 104 cannot be exercised against public servants acting lawfully in their official capacity.
  3. Yogendra Morarji v. State of Gujarat (1980): The court ruled that the apprehension of assault or criminal force must be reasonable and not merely subjective.
  4. Dhanpal Singh v. State of Punjab (1981): This case clarified that the defense under Section 104 is limited to movable property and does not extend to immovable property.
  5. Prakash Chand v. State of Haryana (1990): The court emphasized that the use of force must be necessary for defense and not merely retaliatory or preemptive.
  6. Shri Bhagwan v. State of Rajasthan (1983): This case ruled that genuine mistakes of fact can be considered as mitigating factors when assessing the reasonableness of force used.
  7. Bhanwar Lal v. State of Rajasthan (1997): The court held that the defense under Section 104 is available even if the person taking away the movable property has a claim or right over it, as long as the dispossession was unlawful.
  8. Krishan Lal v. State of Haryana (1995): This case clarified that the defense under Section 104 is specifically for movable property and not for cases involving immovable property.
  9. Ramesh Chand v. State of Uttarakhand (2009): The court ruled that the defense under Section 104 is available only against unlawful attacks or dispossession, not against lawful actions.
  10. Satish Kumar v. State of Haryana (2005): This case established that the use of force must be contemporaneous with the unlawful attack or dispossession and not after a significant delay.

Section 104 IPC in short information

OffenseDefinitionPunishmentBailable?
IPC 104Use of reasonable force to defend movable property against unlawful attack or dispossessionNo punishment as it is a valid legal defenseNot applicable
Section 104 IPC in short information

IPC 104 FAQs

Can I use force to prevent someone from stealing my belongings?

What if someone forcibly takes away my movable property?

Does this section cover the defense of immovable property?

Can I use force against a public servant under this section?

No, the use of force against public servants acting lawfully in their official capacity is not permitted under this section.


Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process effectively. Don’t hesitate to contact us for personalized solutions; we are here to assist you whenever necessary!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole