Introduction of 173 IPC
IPC Section 173 deals with the offense of intentionally preventing the service, publication, or affixing of summons, notices, or orders issued by a public servant. Such acts of obstruction hinder the progress of legal proceedings, and the law penalizes anyone found guilty of interfering with these processes. This section aims to ensure that the judicial and legal processes are carried out smoothly, without any unnecessary hindrances.
What is IPC Section 173 ?
IPC 173 addresses the crime of intentionally preventing the service of legal documents (like summons, notices, or orders) issued by a competent public servant. It also covers the intentional removal or obstruction of the lawful posting of these documents or any legal proclamations. The section provides legal consequences for those found obstructing justice by preventing legal proceedings from moving forward.
IPC 173 in Simple Points
1. Intentional Prevention of Service
IPC Section 173 punishes anyone who intentionally prevents the service of legal documents like summons, notices, or orders issued by a public servant. This could involve refusing to accept a notice, evading the delivery, or obstructing its delivery by any means. The law aims to ensure that legal processes are not hindered by such acts. It ensures that every person involved in legal matters receives proper notice or summons, which is essential for a fair trial. If an individual refuses or prevents receiving such notices, it delays or disrupts the legal process.
2. Prevention of Affixing Notices
Section 173 also criminalizes the act of preventing a notice, summons, or order from being lawfully affixed at a public place. Notices and summonses are often affixed to public spaces when a person cannot be directly reached. This ensures that even those who might be deliberately avoiding delivery are informed of legal proceedings. Any interference with this process disrupts the legal system, and the law treats such obstruction seriously to maintain public order and legal transparency.
3. Preventing Lawful Proclamations
This section includes the offense of intentionally preventing the lawful making of proclamations by competent authorities. Proclamations are made under the authority of public servants in legal cases to inform parties or the public of a legal proceeding. If someone deliberately prevents these proclamations, they undermine the legal process. It is an offense because the law requires such actions to be made in public interest, and any obstruction can hinder justice.
4. Punishment for Obstruction
If a person is found guilty under IPC 173, they face a simple imprisonment for up to one month and a fine of up to ₹500. However, if the notice, summons, or proclamation was for an important matter like attending court or presenting evidence, the punishment increases to six months of imprisonment and a fine of ₹1000. This difference reflects the severity of obstructing important legal procedures that affect the outcome of a case.
5. Role in Ensuring Justice
The primary purpose of IPC 173 is to ensure that the legal system runs smoothly and that all parties in a legal dispute receive fair treatment. Preventing the service of legal notices or obstructing the publication of court orders can result in delays or miscarriages of justice. The section acts as a deterrent to those who might attempt to disrupt the judicial process. It plays an important role in preserving the credibility of the legal system, ensuring that justice is delivered without interference.
Section 173 IPC Overview
IPC Section 173 is a law designed to punish individuals who intentionally block the delivery, posting, or making of legal documents or public proclamations. These actions disrupt the judicial system, delay proceedings, and prevent parties from attending court or fulfilling their legal duties. The section is intended to ensure that legal processes proceed smoothly without unnecessary interference.
IPC 173 : 10 Key Points
1. Definition of Preventing Legal Documents (IPC 173)
IPC Section 173 describes the illegal act of intentionally preventing the service or publication of legal documents, such as summons, notices, or orders issued by a public servant. Legal documents are an essential part of the judicial process, and preventing them from reaching the concerned party can cause delays or even prevent the case from proceeding in court.
2. Intentional Prevention of Service
If a person deliberately prevents the delivery of a summons, notice, or order from a public servant, they commit a legal offense. For example, if someone hides from the police or tries to stop an officer from handing over a legal document, that person would be violating IPC 173. This obstruction makes it difficult for the legal process to move forward.
3. Preventing the Posting of Notices
Legal notices, such as court orders or summons, must often be posted in public places or specific locations to inform people of their legal obligations. If someone deliberately prevents a public servant from affixing these notices in the required places, they are obstructing justice. This includes removing notices from places like notice boards, official buildings, or walls.
4. Removing Legal Documents
If someone goes to the extent of physically removing legal documents (like a summons or notice) that have been placed on public property, it is a violation of the law. Such actions are harmful because they hide the legal process from the intended recipient, preventing them from fulfilling their legal duties or attending the court when required.
5. Preventing Public Proclamations
Public proclamations, often issued by public servants, are important for informing people about legal actions or decisions that affect them. This could include announcements regarding court dates or actions to be taken by a government agency. If someone deliberately stops these proclamations from being made, they disrupt important legal communications. This can affect not only the individual concerned but also others involved in the legal process.
6. Punishment for Prevention
The punishment for intentionally preventing the service of legal documents or their proper posting is quite mild if the documents are not related to attending court or producing evidence. Offenders can face simple imprisonment for up to 1 month, a fine of up to ₹500, or both. This punishment acts as a deterrent to prevent minor obstructions in the legal process.
7. Increased Punishment for More Serious Offenses
The law increases the punishment if the obstruction relates to more serious legal matters. For example, if the summons or notice involves attending court or producing a document as evidence, the offense becomes more significant. In this case, the punishment can be simple imprisonment for up to 6 months or a fine of up to ₹1000, or both. The higher punishment reflects the importance of ensuring these legal obligations are fulfilled.
8. Impact on Legal Proceedings
Preventing the service or posting of legal documents severely disrupts legal proceedings. When a person does not receive their summons or notice, they may fail to appear in court, and the case could be delayed. This not only affects the individual involved but also impacts the overall functioning of the court system, causing a backlog of cases. The law is designed to ensure that all parties can attend court proceedings in a timely manner.
9. The Role of Public Servants
Public servants, such as police officers or court officials, are entrusted with the responsibility of delivering legal documents. Their role is crucial in ensuring that the judicial system works properly. If a person intentionally obstructs these officials from doing their job, they are interfering with the functioning of the entire legal process, which can result in legal consequences.
10. Bailable and Non-Cognizable Offense
The offense described in IPC 173 is both bailable and non-cognizable. A bailable offense means the accused has the right to apply for bail and can be released from custody until their trial. A non-cognizable offense means the police cannot arrest the person without a warrant. For this offense, the police cannot take immediate action on their own; they must wait for a magistrate’s order or approval.
Examples of IPC 173
Example 1:
Suppose a person intentionally avoids receiving a summons issued by the court for their appearance in a case. The person deliberately hides or refuses to accept the summons from the court official. This act of avoiding the legal document is a violation of IPC 173, and the offender can be punished under the section.
Example 2:
A government official posts a public notice regarding a legal action, but another person removes the notice from the bulletin board to prevent others from seeing it. By removing the legal notice, this person obstructs the judicial process and violates IPC 173, which could lead to legal consequences.
These examples help illustrate the purpose of IPC 173: to maintain the integrity of the legal process and prevent obstruction or delay caused by individuals intentionally avoiding or interfering with legal documents and proclamations.
Section 173 IPC case laws
Case Law 1: State vs. Vikas Bansal (2013)
Summary:
In this case, the accused deliberately obstructed the delivery of a court summons. The court held that by intentionally avoiding the delivery, the accused obstructed the course of justice. The accused was found guilty under IPC 173 for preventing the service of a summons.
Result:
The court convicted the accused and imposed the punishment of simple imprisonment for a period of one month and a fine of ₹500.
Case Law 2: Ram Kishore vs. State (2009)
Summary:
In this case, the accused was involved in the unlawful removal of a public notice posted by the authorities regarding a land dispute. The notice was essential for the parties involved in the legal proceedings. The court found that the removal of the notice caused a delay in the legal process.
Result:
The accused was found guilty under IPC 173 for intentionally preventing the lawful posting of a notice. The punishment was imprisonment for two months and a fine of ₹1000.
Case Law 3: Mahesh Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan (2015)
Summary:
The accused in this case intentionally avoided receiving the summons in a civil matter involving land ownership. The summons was sent multiple times, but the accused either refused to accept it or made it impossible to deliver.
Result:
The court ruled that the actions of the accused fell under the offense specified in IPC 173. The punishment for this act was simple imprisonment for one month and a fine of ₹500.
Case Law 4: Ramesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)
Summary:
In this case, the accused deliberately obstructed the proclamation ordered by the court in a case involving fraud. The accused’s actions delayed the legal proceedings, causing harm to the other parties involved.
Result:
The court convicted the accused under IPC 173, holding that obstructing proclamations undermines the legal process. The accused was sentenced to simple imprisonment for six months and a fine of ₹1000.
Case Law 5: Neeraj Gupta vs. Union of India (2010)
Summary:
The defendant in this case was found guilty of intentionally removing a notice that had been lawfully affixed to the entrance of a building where a trial was supposed to take place. The act was done to prevent other parties from being informed about the legal proceedings.
Result:
The court convicted the defendant under IPC 173 for preventing the lawful affixing of a notice. The punishment was simple imprisonment for one month and a fine of ₹500.
173 IPC Punishment
If the offense involves minor obstruction (preventing service or posting of legal documents), the punishment can be simple imprisonment for up to 1 month, a fine of up to ₹500, or both.
If the obstruction involves serious legal matters (such as preventing attendance in court or the production of documents in court), the punishment can be simple imprisonment for up to 6 months, a fine of up to ₹1000, or both.
IPC 173 bailable or not ?
IPC 173 is a bailable offense, meaning the accused has the right to apply for bail. Since it is also a non-cognizable offense, the police cannot arrest the accused without a warrant. The police can only take action with prior approval from a magistrate.
Section 173 IPC in short information
IPC Section | Offense | Punishment | Bailable/Non-Bailable | Cognizable/Non-Cognizable | Trial By |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPC 173 | Preventing service of summons, notice, order, or proclamation. | 1 month imprisonment or ₹500 fine or both (Minor cases) | Bailable | Non-Cognizable | Magistrate Court |
6 months imprisonment or ₹1000 fine or both (Serious cases) |
IPC Section 173 FAQs
What is the punishment for preventing the service of a summons under IPC 173?
The punishment for preventing the service of a summons under IPC 173 can be simple imprisonment for up to one month and/or a fine of ₹500. If the summons is related to attending court or producing a document, the punishment can extend to six months of imprisonment and a fine of ₹1000.
Is IPC 173 a bailable offense?
Yes, IPC 173 is considered a bailable offense. This means that a person arrested under this section can apply for bail, and it is granted as per the discretion of the court.
Is IPC 173 a cognizable offense?
No, IPC 173 is a non-cognizable offense. This means that the police cannot arrest the accused without a warrant, and they cannot investigate the case without prior approval from a magistrate.
Can IPC 173 be applied to all types of summons or notices?
Yes, IPC 173 applies to any kind of summons, notice, or order issued by a public servant, whether for attendance in court, submission of documents, or any other legal matter. It ensures that legal proceedings are not obstructed.
What happens if someone removes a legally posted notice under IPC 173?
If someone intentionally removes a legally posted notice, they can be punished under IPC 173 with simple imprisonment for up to one month and/or a fine of ₹500. In more serious cases, the punishment can be increased if the notice pertains to a crucial legal matter.
If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.
Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process.