IPC 204

---

Introduction of 204 IPC

Section 204 of the Indian Penal Code ensures that evidence crucial to legal proceedings is not tampered with or destroyed. The section is essential in maintaining the fairness of trials by penalizing those who attempt to manipulate the legal system through destruction or concealment of documents. In an era where evidence can be both physical and digital, this provision plays a critical role in safeguarding the authenticity of information presented in court.

---

---

What is IPC Section 204 ?

IPC Section 204 addresses the intentional destruction, alteration, or concealment of any document or electronic record to prevent it from being used as evidence in legal proceedings. It is designed to protect the integrity of the judicial process by ensuring that all relevant evidence is preserved and presented fairly.

---

IPC 204 in Simple Points

1. Meaning of IPC 204

IPC 204 is a legal provision that punishes anyone who deliberately destroys, hides, or alters any document or electronic record to prevent it from being used as evidence in court. This law ensures that all important evidence remains intact and available for legal processes. Without this law, people could manipulate the outcome of cases by simply destroying documents that could prove their guilt or someone else’s innocence.

2. Types of Acts Covered

This section covers different actions related to documents and electronic records, such as:

• Tearing, burning, or throwing away important documents, like contracts or agreements.
• Deleting files, emails, or other electronic data that could be used in a legal case.
• Altering documents by changing dates, amounts, or names to mislead the court.
  Any such deliberate act that stops a document from being used as evidence is punishable under IPC 204.

3. Importance of Intention

To punish someone under IPC 204, it must be proven that they intended to prevent the document from being produced as evidence. If a person accidentally damages a document, they are not guilty under this section. But if someone knowingly destroys a document because they don’t want it to be seen in court, that is a clear violation of IPC 204. The intention behind the act is the most critical part when applying this law.

4. Punishment for the Offense

The punishment under IPC 204 reflects the seriousness of tampering with evidence. A person found guilty can face:

• Imprisonment for up to 2 years, depending on the case’s circumstances.
• A fine, which can be determined by the court based on the impact of the destroyed evidence.
• In some cases, both imprisonment and a fine can be imposed together, ensuring that the offender faces proper consequences for their actions.

5. Applicability in Legal Proceedings

IPC 204 applies to any legal process where evidence is required, including court trials, police investigations, and government inquiries. Even if a person thinks that a document might be used against them in the future and destroys it beforehand, they can be charged under this section. This ensures that all documents and electronic records are preserved, allowing fair trials and preventing injustice.

---

Section 204 IPC Overview

Whoever secretes or destroys any document or electronic record which he may be lawfully compelled to produce as evidence in a court of law, with the intention of preventing its production, shall be punished under this section.

10 Key Points of IPC 204

1. Definition of IPC 204

IPC Section 204 criminalizes the intentional destruction, alteration, or concealment of any document or electronic record with the purpose of preventing its use as evidence in legal proceedings. This section ensures that no one can deliberately remove or modify essential evidence that could influence the outcome of a case. The act of destroying a document not only hinders justice but also violates the fundamental principles of fair trial, making it a punishable offense.

2. Purpose of the Law

The primary aim of IPC 204 is to uphold the sanctity and integrity of the legal process by ensuring that all evidence, whether favorable or unfavorable, is presented before the court. Without this law, individuals could manipulate legal proceedings by conveniently eliminating documents that could prove their guilt or someone else’s innocence. Therefore, this provision acts as a safeguard against tampering with evidence and ensures that justice is served based on complete and unaltered facts.

3. Act of Destruction or Alteration

This provision covers any act that leads to the destruction, mutilation, alteration, or concealment of a document or electronic record. Even minor alterations, such as changing dates, deleting sections, or adding false information, are punishable under IPC 204. For example, tearing up a written contract, deleting crucial emails, or altering financial records to hide fraud are all acts covered by this section. It ensures that no one can escape liability by claiming that the damage was insignificant.

4. Document or Electronic Record

The term “document” under IPC 204 is broad and includes any written, printed, or recorded material. With the advancement of technology, the law also covers electronic records, such as emails, digital files, databases, and audio or video recordings. This inclusion ensures that evidence stored in any form, whether physical or digital, is protected under the law. Destroying a physical contract or deleting an important email with the intent to prevent its use as evidence are both equally punishable under this section.

5. Intention Behind the Act

One of the most critical elements of IPC 204 is the intention behind the act. The prosecution must prove that the accused intended to prevent the document or record from being used as evidence. This means that the act of destruction was deliberate and not accidental. For instance, if a person burns a document knowing it could be used as evidence in a fraud case, their intention is clear. However, accidentally damaging a document without such intent would not attract punishment under this section.

6. Legal Proceedings Context

For IPC 204 to apply, the document or electronic record must be relevant to legal proceedings that are either ongoing or anticipated. This includes court trials, police investigations, inquiries, or any other judicial process where the document could have been presented as evidence. Even if the legal proceedings have not yet started, but the person anticipates that the document could be used against them in the future, destroying it with that anticipation makes them liable under this section.

7. Punishment Under IPC 204

The punishment prescribed under IPC 204 reflects the seriousness of the offense. A person convicted under this section can face imprisonment for up to two years, a fine, or both. Although the punishment may seem relatively mild compared to more severe crimes, it serves as a deterrent against tampering with evidence, which can have far-reaching consequences on the outcome of legal proceedings and the delivery of justice.

8. Bailable and Cognizable Offense

IPC 204 is categorized as a bailable and non-cognizable offense. This means that while the accused has the right to seek bail, the police cannot arrest them or start an investigation without prior approval from a magistrate. This classification balances the need to prevent the abuse of the provision while ensuring that those who genuinely attempt to obstruct justice are held accountable through proper legal channels.

9. Importance in Judicial Process

The existence of IPC 204 is vital for maintaining the fairness and credibility of judicial proceedings. Without such a provision, parties involved in legal disputes could easily manipulate outcomes by removing or altering key evidence. This section ensures that all evidence, regardless of its nature, is preserved and presented, thus preventing wrongful convictions, protecting the innocent, and ensuring that justice is based on complete facts and not tampered records.

10. Illustrative Example

Consider a scenario where a person involved in a business dispute destroys a signed contract that proves their liability to repay a loan. By doing so, they intend to prevent the other party from using the contract as evidence in court. Similarly, if an employee facing allegations of embezzlement deletes digital financial records that could prove their guilt, they can be charged under IPC 204. These examples highlight how the section applies to various real-life situations involving both physical and electronic evidence.

Example 1:

A person is involved in a property dispute. To avoid losing the case, they tear up the original property papers that the other party could have used as evidence in court. This is a punishable offense under IPC 204 because the person intentionally destroyed important documents to prevent their use as evidence.

Example 2:

An employee facing allegations of financial fraud deletes all the company’s financial records from the computer to hide their wrongdoing. Since the records could have been used as evidence, deleting them deliberately comes under IPC 204, making the employee liable for punishment.

---

Section 204 IPC case laws

1. B.S. Narayanan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1987)

Facts: The appellant, along with others, was accused of intentionally destroying documents to prevent their use as evidence in a legal proceeding.

Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 204 IPC, emphasizing that deliberate destruction of evidence undermines the judicial process and warrants strict punishment.

2. Yogita P. Gosalia v. S.B. Morey (2010)

Facts: The petitioner was charged under Sections 181, 201, and 204 of the IPC for allegedly destroying documents pertinent to a case.

Judgment: The Bombay High Court observed that for a charge under Section 204 IPC to be sustained, there must be clear evidence of intentional destruction or concealment of documents to prevent their production as evidence.

3. Smt. Usha Devi v. State of U.P. and Others (2015)

Facts: The applicant filed a complaint alleging that the accused had destroyed documents to obstruct justice.

Judgment: The Allahabad High Court directed the lower court to expedite the proceedings under Section 204 IPC, highlighting the seriousness of offenses involving the destruction of evidence.

4. Bharatsingh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2006)

Facts: The appellants were accused of destroying documents to prevent their production in a legal proceeding.

Judgment: The Madhya Pradesh High Court convicted the appellants under Section 204 IPC, underscoring that such actions are detrimental to the administration of justice and must be dealt with sternly.

5. Shri M.L. Sethi v. Shri R.P. Kapur and Another (1966)

Facts: The petitioner was accused of secreting documents to prevent their production as evidence in court.

Judgment: The Supreme Court held that intentional concealment or destruction of documents, which one is lawfully compelled to produce, constitutes an offense under Section 204 IPC, as it obstructs the course of justice.

---

204 IPC Punishment

1. Imprisonment: Punishment includes imprisonment for a term that may extend to two years, depending on the gravity of the offense.
2. Fine: The offender may also be liable to pay a fine, which can vary based on the court’s discretion, or both imprisonment and fine together.

---

204 IPC Bailable or non bailable

• IPC 204 is a bailable offense, meaning the accused can seek bail.
• It is a non-cognizable offense, meaning police need permission from a magistrate to investigate.
• The trial for this offense is conducted by a Magistrate.

---

Section 204 IPC in short information

IPC Section	Offense	Punishment	Bailable/Non-Bailable	Cognizable/Non-Cognizable	Trial By
204	Destruction of document to prevent its production as evidence	Imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both	Bailable	Non-Cognizable	Magistrate

---

IPC Section 204 FAQs

---

If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.

Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process.

---