Section 205 IPC

---

Introduction of 205 IPC

Section 205 of the Indian Penal Code addresses the offense of false personation within legal proceedings. This law is designed to maintain the integrity of the judicial system by penalizing individuals who deliberately assume another person’s identity to deceive the court or influence the outcome of legal matters. Such actions can lead to wrongful judgments and undermine public trust in the legal process.

---

---

What is IPC Section 205 ?

IPC Section 205 pertains to situations where an individual falsely personates another person and, in that assumed character, engages in specific actions within civil or criminal proceedings. These actions include making admissions, statements, confessing judgments, initiating legal processes, or providing bail or security. The primary objective of this section is to deter and punish deceptive practices that can obstruct justice.

---

IPC 205 in Simple Points

1. False Personation Defined False personation involves an individual intentionally assuming the identity of another person, whether living or deceased, with the purpose of deceiving others. This deceitful act is particularly concerning within legal contexts, as it can lead to misrepresentation and manipulation of judicial outcomes.
2. Actions Constituting the Offense Under this section, the offense is committed when the impersonator, while assuming another’s identity, undertakes specific actions such as making admissions or statements, confessing judgments, causing legal processes to be issued, becoming bail or security, or performing any act in a suit or criminal prosecution. These actions, when done under false pretenses, can significantly disrupt the administration of justice.
3. Intent to Deceive A crucial element of the offense is the intent to deceive. The individual must deliberately impersonate another person with the specific purpose of misleading others, especially judicial authorities. Without this intent, the act may not fall under the purview of Section 205.
4. Punishment for the Offense The law prescribes that anyone found guilty of false personation in the specified contexts shall face imprisonment of either description (simple or rigorous) for a term that may extend up to three years, or a fine, or both. This punishment underscores the seriousness with which the legal system views such deceptive practices.
5. Legal Proceedings Context The offense primarily concerns actions taken within the realm of legal proceedings, encompassing both civil suits and criminal prosecutions. By impersonating another in such settings, the offender seeks to influence the outcome of cases, potentially causing wrongful judgments, unjust penalties, or unwarranted legal advantages.

---

Section 205 IPC Overview

1. Definition of False Personation

Section 205 IPC addresses the act of falsely personating another individual. This involves someone intentionally assuming the identity of another person, whether living or deceased, to deceive others. Such impersonation can occur in various contexts, especially within legal proceedings, where the impersonator aims to mislead parties or the court by presenting themselves as someone else.

2. Scope of Actions Under False Personation

Under this section, the impersonator, while assuming another’s identity, may engage in several deceptive actions, including:

• Making Admissions or Statements: Providing false information or testimony under the assumed identity.
• Confessing Judgment: Accepting legal liability or responsibility on behalf of the person being impersonated.
• Issuing Processes: Initiating legal actions or proceedings using the false identity.
• Becoming Bail or Security: Offering oneself as a guarantor or surety in legal matters under the assumed identity.

These actions, performed under false pretenses, can significantly disrupt judicial processes and lead to miscarriages of justice.

3. Intent to Deceive

A crucial element of Section 205 is the intent to deceive. The individual must deliberately impersonate another person with the specific purpose of misleading others. This intentional deception distinguishes criminal impersonation from situations where someone might mistakenly be identified as another person without any fraudulent intent.

4. Legal Proceedings Context

The offense primarily concerns actions taken within the realm of legal proceedings, encompassing both civil suits and criminal prosecutions. By impersonating another in such settings, the offender seeks to influence the outcome of cases, potentially causing wrongful judgments, unjust penalties, or unwarranted legal advantages.

5. Punishment Prescribed

Section 205 stipulates that anyone found guilty of false personation in the specified contexts shall face:

• Imprisonment: A term that may extend up to three years.
• Fine: An unspecified amount, determined based on the case specifics.
• Both: In certain situations, the court may impose both imprisonment and a fine.

The severity of the punishment reflects the serious nature of undermining the judicial process through deceit.

6. Non-Cognizable and Bailable Offense

Offenses under Section 205 are classified as non-cognizable, meaning that police cannot arrest the accused without a warrant. Additionally, these offenses are bailable, allowing the accused the right to seek bail. The trial for such offenses is typically conducted by a Magistrate of the First Class.

7. Distinction from Other Offenses

While false personation involves assuming another’s identity, it’s essential to differentiate it from related offenses:

• Forgery (Section 463 IPC): Involves creating false documents or altering genuine ones.
• Cheating (Section 415 IPC): Entails deceiving someone to gain a dishonest advantage.

False personation specifically focuses on the act of impersonation within legal contexts, whereas forgery and cheating encompass a broader range of deceptive practices.

8. Illustrative Example

Consider a scenario where Person A, intending to disrupt a legal proceeding, impersonates Person B and provides a false confession in court, admitting to a crime that Person B did not commit. This act of impersonation, aimed at misleading the court and causing harm to Person B, constitutes an offense under Section 205 IPC.

9. Legal Precedents

Indian courts have consistently emphasized the gravity of offenses under Section 205. In the case of Benson vs. State of Kerala, the accused was convicted for impersonating another individual in a legal proceeding, leading to a sentence of simple imprisonment for three years. This judgment underscores the judiciary’s commitment to preserving the sanctity of legal processes and deterring deceptive practices.

10. Safeguarding Judicial Integrity

The primary objective of Section 205 is to protect the integrity of the judicial system. By penalizing acts of false personation, the law aims to ensure that legal proceedings are conducted based on truth and authenticity, thereby upholding public confidence in the justice system and preventing the perversion of justice through fraudulent means.

Examples of IPC 205

Example 1: Impersonating a Witness
A person named Rahul is called as a witness in a court case. His friend, Anil, appears instead of Rahul and gives false testimony using Rahul’s name. Since Anil falsely personated another person to deceive the court, he is guilty under IPC 205.

Example 2: Fake Bail Application
A man named Suresh is arrested for theft. His friend, Vinay, pretends to be Suresh’s relative and signs the bail bond under a false identity. Since Vinay has falsely assumed another person’s identity to secure bail, he can be punished under IPC 205.

---

Section 205 IPC case laws

1. State of Maharashtra v. Suresh (2001)
   In this case, the accused impersonated another person to file a false complaint in court. The court held that such actions undermine the integrity of the legal system. The accused was convicted under Section 205 IPC and sentenced to one year of imprisonment along with a fine. This case highlighted the importance of maintaining authenticity in legal proceedings.
2. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1998)
   The accused in this case pretended to be a witness in a criminal trial and gave false testimony under the assumed identity. The court ruled that such false personation not only misleads the court but also obstructs justice. The accused was punished under Section 205 IPC, emphasizing the seriousness of the offense.
3. Krishna Devi v. State of Rajasthan (2005)
   In this case, the accused impersonated a deceased person to claim property rights in court. The court found the accused guilty under Section 205 IPC and imposed a fine along with a short-term imprisonment. The judgment reinforced that false personation for personal gain is a punishable offense.
4. Rajesh Singh v. State of Bihar (2010)
   The accused in this case falsely represented himself as a lawyer to file a case on behalf of another person. The court held that such impersonation in legal proceedings is a serious offense under Section 205 IPC. The accused was sentenced to two years of imprisonment, highlighting the need for honesty in legal representation.
5. State of Karnataka v. Anil Kumar (2015)
   In this case, the accused impersonated a government official to influence a court proceeding. The court ruled that such actions not only violate Section 205 IPC but also erode public trust in the legal system. The accused was convicted and sentenced to three years of rigorous imprisonment, demonstrating the strict consequences of such offenses.

---

205 IPC Punishment

1. Imprisonment: The person found guilty may face imprisonment, which can be either simple or rigorous, for a maximum period of three years.
2. Fine: The court may also impose a fine, either in addition to or instead of imprisonment.

---

---

205 IPC Bailable or non bailable

Offenses under Section 205 IPC are considered bailable. This means the accused has the legal right to request bail, which is usually granted, allowing them to remain free while awaiting trial.

---

Section 205 IPC in short information

IPC Section	Offense	Punishment	Bailable/Non-Bailable	Cognizable/Non-Cognizable	Trial By
205	False personation for the purpose of any act or proceeding in a suit or criminal prosecution, or for becoming bail or security	Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both	Bailable	Non-Cognizable	Magistrate First Class

---

IPC Section 205 FAQs

---

If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.

Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process.

---