Introduction of BNS Section 50
BNS Section 50 talks about what happens if someone helps another person commit a crime, but the person who did the crime had a different plan or intention. Even if the actual crime is different from what the helper intended, the helper will still be punished as if the crime happened the way they intended. This section makes sure that those who assist in crimes are held responsible, even if things don’t turn out exactly as planned
What is section 50 of BNS ?
BNS Section 50 means that if you help someone commit a crime, but the crime they commit is different from what you planned or intended, you will still be punished based on what you wanted to happen. The law makes sure that helpers are responsible for the crime, even if the outcome is different from what they expected.
BNS Section 50 in Simple Points
Abetment from Abroad: If a person outside India helps someone commit a crime inside India, they are treated as if they committed the crime themselves.
- Example: If A in country X tells B in India to rob a bank, A is guilty of abetting the robbery.
Criminal Responsibility: The person who provides help from outside India is responsible for the crime that happens in India.
- Example: If A assists B in India to commit fraud via emails, A is accountable for the fraud in India.
Indian Law Applies: Even if the assistance occurs outside India, Indian law applies to the abettor if the crime is committed in India.
- Example: A in country Y instructs B in India to commit arson, and A can be prosecuted under Indian law.
International Coordination: This section ensures that criminal actions are addressed regardless of where the abettor is located.
- Example: A in country Z conspires with B in India to commit a crime, and A is still prosecuted in India.
No Escape Due to Location: Being outside India does not exempt someone from being punished if they aid in a crime within India.
- Example: A in country W provides resources to B in India for a crime, and A is liable under Indian law.
Section 50 BNS Overview
BNS Section 50 addresses the situation where someone assists or encourages another person to commit a crime, but the person who commits the crime does so with a different intention or understanding. In such cases, the abettor is punished as if the crime had been committed with their original intention.
Key Points
- Different Intentions: If the person who was helped or encouraged commits the crime with a different intention than the abettor, the abettor is punished based on the original intended crime.
- Example: If A encourages B to steal to get money for charity, but B steals for personal gain, A is punished as if the theft was committed with the intention to gain personal benefit.
- Punishment Based on Abettor’s Intent: The abettor is punished according to the crime that would have been committed if the act had been done with their intention, not the one with the actual intention.
- Example: If A helps B to commit a robbery, and B performs it with a different motive, A is still punished for the robbery as if it was committed with A’s original motive.
- Legal Classification: The offence is classified based on whether it is cognizable or non-cognizable, bailable or non-bailable, and whether it is compoundable.
- Example: If the original intended crime was cognizable, the abettor’s punishment will reflect that classification.
- No Change in Nature of Crime: Even if the person who committed the crime had a different intention, the nature of the crime remains the same for the purpose of punishment of the abettor.
- Example: If A helps B to commit arson for a specific purpose and B does it for a different reason, A is punished for arson.
- Trial by Same Court: The offence will be tried by the same court that would have tried the original intended crime.
- Example: If A’s intended crime was a serious offence, such as murder, the trial will be conducted by the court handling such serious offences.
- Explanation of Intent: The intention behind the crime is crucial in determining the punishment of the abettor.
- Example: If A’s intended crime was for financial gain but B’s actual crime was for revenge, A’s punishment is based on the financial gain motive.
- Differences in Execution: The differences between the abettor’s and the actual perpetrator’s intentions do not affect the abettor’s liability.
- Example: A’s intention to help B commit fraud remains relevant even if B commits a different form of fraud.
- Judicial Discretion: Courts may have discretion in applying the punishment based on the discrepancies in intention.
- Example: If A’s intended crime was less severe but B’s execution was more severe, the court may adjust the punishment accordingly.
- Intentional vs. Actual Crime: The abettor’s intent is used to judge their punishment regardless of how the crime was actually carried out.
- Example: A’s intention to cause harm is used to determine their punishment even if B’s actions caused different harm.
- Legal Consistency: This section ensures that the abettor is held accountable based on their original intentions and not on the altered outcome of the crime.
- Example: If A’s crime was intended to be non-violent but B’s actions resulted in violence, A’s punishment is based on the original non-violent intention.
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 50
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Definition | Punishment for abetment if the person who committed the crime had a different intention from the abettor. |
| Offence | Abetment of a crime where the actual perpetrator’s intention differs from the abettor’s intention. |
| Punishment | Same as for the crime committed with the abettor’s original intention. |
| Bailable | Depends on the classification of the offence (bailable or non-bailable). |
BNS Section 50 FAQs
BNS Section 50 FAQsWhat happens if the abettor’s intention differs from the actual perpetrator’s?
The abettor is punished based on the intention they had, not the intention of the person who committed the crime.
Is the abettor’s punishment affected by the actual crime committed?
No, the punishment is based on the abettor’s original intention, regardless of the actual crime.
How is the severity of punishment determined?
The severity is based on what the abettor intended, not what the actual perpetrator did.
Does the court have any discretion in punishing the abettor?
Yes, the court may use discretion to adjust the punishment based on the differences in intention.
If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.
Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the proc