Introduction to Section 364 BNSS
BNSS Section 364 deals with cases where a Magistrate feels that the punishment required is beyond his powers. This section gives the Magistrate the authority to submit the case to a higher court, specifically the Chief Judicial Magistrate. It ensures that serious crimes receive appropriate sentences according to the law. This provision strengthens the justice system by maintaining the balance of authority among different levels of courts.
What is BNSS Section 364 ?
BNSS Section 364 explains that when a Magistrate finds an accused guilty but feels the punishment required is either different in kind or more severe than his jurisdiction allows, he must record his opinion and forward the case along with the accused to the Chief Judicial Magistrate. If there are multiple accused, all those found guilty are forwarded. The Chief Judicial Magistrate then has the power to call witnesses, hear further evidence, and pass the final judgment.
BNSS Section of 364 in Simple Points
1. Purpose of BNSS Section 364
BNSS Section 364 deals with the situation when a Magistrate realizes that the punishment required for an offence is beyond his legal power. This happens when the offence committed is serious and deserves a harsher or different type of punishment. In such cases, instead of giving a lesser punishment, the Magistrate must refer the case to a higher authority. The idea is to ensure that justice is not compromised due to limited powers. This section protects the principle of proportional punishment. It promotes judicial hierarchy and proper sentencing. The case is forwarded with detailed records and opinions. The Chief Judicial Magistrate then takes over the matter.
2. Magistrate’s Limit on Sentencing
A Magistrate, especially a second-class one, has limited authority to pass certain types or levels of punishment. If after hearing both parties, the Magistrate feels the punishment needed is beyond what he can order, he cannot go ahead on his own. For example, if he can only sentence up to 1 year, but the crime deserves more, he must refer the case. This ensures that accused persons are not under-punished for grave offences. The law recognizes that not all judicial officers have the same power. Therefore, Section 364 bridges this gap effectively. It ensures justice through appropriate levels of sentencing authority.
3. Forwarding the Case to Chief Judicial Magistrate
When a Magistrate decides that the punishment is beyond his power, he must submit the full proceedings and the accused to the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The CJM is usually the head Magistrate of the district and has broader powers. The Magistrate also adds a report explaining why he believes harsher punishment is needed. This step ensures transparency and accountability. It also avoids unnecessary retrials. The accused is physically presented or legally transferred to the CJM. This legal handover guarantees the continuity of justice without delay or loss of evidence.
4. When Multiple Accused Are Involved
Section 364 also covers cases with more than one accused. If a group of people are being tried together, and the Magistrate believes that some need higher punishment, he cannot separate the trial. Instead, all those he finds guilty are sent to the CJM. This prevents splitting of trials and inconsistency in verdicts. The Magistrate must identify which accused deserve more serious attention. Only those who are presumed guilty are forwarded. This approach keeps the case consolidated. It avoids confusion, delay, and multiple legal proceedings.
5. Powers of the Chief Judicial Magistrate
Once the case reaches the CJM, he has full discretion to examine the case afresh. The CJM may call both parties and even re-examine witnesses who have already testified. He can also summon new evidence to ensure fairness. The CJM then delivers the final judgment or punishment, which can be more severe. This ensures that the gravity of the crime is properly addressed. The section empowers the CJM to take over the case completely. It allows for a second level of judicial scrutiny to maintain fairness. The process is judicially balanced and transparent.
364 BNSS Overview
BNSS Section 364 ensures that when a Magistrate realizes the sentence he can legally impose is not sufficient for a particular case, the matter is forwarded to a higher authority. The Chief Judicial Magistrate then takes over and is empowered to deliver a suitable judgment. This section is applicable when the accused is found guilty after hearing evidence and when the nature of the crime demands a stricter or different type of punishment.
BNSS Section 364 – 10 Key Points Explained in Detail
1. Applicability of Section 364
BNSS Section 364 applies when a Magistrate, after hearing a case, believes that the accused deserves a punishment that is either different in nature or more severe than the punishment he is authorized to give. This includes cases where imprisonment is needed beyond the limits of that Magistrate’s power. It ensures justice by not allowing minor courts to give light sentences for serious crimes. In such cases, the Magistrate is required to escalate the matter to the Chief Judicial Magistrate. This system maintains the proper structure of judicial authority. The provision is intended to balance jurisdiction and justice. This is especially important in cases where fair sentencing matters deeply. BNSS 364 thus safeguards legal consistency.
2. Submission of Proceedings to Higher Authority
When a Magistrate feels that a more severe sentence is necessary, he must record his opinion in writing. After doing so, he forwards all case documents, along with the accused, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate. This formal submission ensures transparency and avoids errors in sentencing. It helps prevent light punishment for serious offences. The Chief Judicial Magistrate then reviews the case thoroughly. It is important that all steps are officially documented to maintain fairness. This legal protocol strengthens confidence in judicial procedure. BNSS 364 respects the principle of just and proportionate punishment.
3. Action in Case of Multiple Accused
If more than one accused is being tried in a case, and the Magistrate thinks that some of them deserve higher punishment, he must forward all those found guilty. The law permits such a step even if the accused were not equally responsible. This avoids fragmented justice and ensures that serious offenders do not escape due to technicalities. The section provides a smooth way to handle group trials involving varying degrees of guilt. It emphasizes that all accused facing serious allegations should be judged at the correct level. The procedure helps maintain unity in judicial decisions. BNSS 364 thus also applies to group trials.
4. Powers of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM)
After receiving the case, the CJM has full authority to take charge of the matter. He can examine parties, re-summon witnesses, and even call for fresh evidence if needed. This provision gives the CJM flexibility and full control over the case. It ensures that the final judgment is based on complete understanding and proper evidence. This step is essential to safeguard against wrongful conviction or unjust sentencing. The CJM’s authority here is guided by fairness and the law. Section 364 thereby supports higher courts with the power and clarity to act effectively. This strengthens justice at the final stage of the trial.
5. Importance of Reasoned Opinion by Magistrate
A very crucial part of Section 364 is that the Magistrate must clearly record his opinion with reasons. It cannot be a vague or informal decision. This written record is essential for the Chief Judicial Magistrate to understand the context of the case. The opinion must reflect the seriousness of the offence and the limitations of the Magistrate. It adds accountability to the process. This requirement also helps prevent arbitrary forwarding of cases. Every step must be legally justifiable. The reasoned opinion acts like a bridge between lower and higher judicial authorities under BNSS 364.
6. Transfer Due to Jurisdictional Limits
Sometimes, a Magistrate may realize that the nature of the offence demands a special kind of punishment or legal requirement. If the Magistrate lacks jurisdiction to handle such a situation, the case must be transferred. This ensures that justice is not hampered due to technical gaps in court power. BNSS 364 functions as a procedural safeguard in such instances. It gives clear direction to Magistrates who encounter cases beyond their legal scope. Transferring the case does not delay justice but ensures it is properly handled. Jurisdictional clarity strengthens legal enforcement across court levels.
7. Provision for Bond or Bail Bond Cases
When a second-class Magistrate believes that the accused should execute a bond or bail bond under Section 125 of BNSS, but the order is beyond his capacity, he can invoke Section 364. This allows the case to be forwarded for appropriate orders. It ensures that legal obligations like surety, bail, or conditional release are not ignored due to jurisdictional limits. This clause gives extra procedural power to second-class courts while preserving the authority of higher courts. It’s an example of thoughtful judicial delegation. BNSS 364 thus balances power and procedural duty.
8. Ensuring Proportionate Punishment
Section 364 is necessary to maintain the principle that punishment must fit the crime. If a Magistrate gives a sentence that is too lenient due to lack of power, it can lead to injustice. BNSS 364 ensures that higher courts can step in and take charge when needed. The law respects the gravity of the crime by allowing senior courts to decide appropriate punishments. This provision is a checkpoint that prevents errors or injustice at the lower court level. It enhances confidence in the criminal justice system. BNSS 364 therefore plays a preventive and corrective role.
9. Streamlined Criminal Procedure
BNSS 364 plays an important role in streamlining the entire trial process. It clearly defines what must happen when the trial needs a heavier sentence than what a Magistrate can give. It avoids confusion or delays in deciding punishment. The process of forwarding the case is direct and legally guided. All steps are clearly defined to reduce time wastage and increase efficiency. It ensures that accused persons are dealt with justly without procedural loopholes. BNSS 364 is part of India’s larger reform efforts in criminal justice. It helps make the system faster and more effective.
10. Legal Integrity and Justice Delivery
The core idea behind Section 364 is integrity in justice delivery. If Magistrates go beyond their powers, it could harm the credibility of the legal system. BNSS 364 prevents such risks by defining a clear upward channel for severe punishments. It ensures that every level of the judiciary works within its defined limits. It also protects the rights of the accused by ensuring they receive a fair and lawful sentence from an empowered authority. This section thus maintains both procedural discipline and human rights. It represents fairness in India’s evolving justice framework.
Example 1:
A second-class Magistrate is trying a case where a man is found guilty of serious domestic violence. The punishment warranted is 5 years imprisonment, but the Magistrate can only sentence up to 1 year. Under BNSS 364, the Magistrate forwards the case to the Chief Judicial Magistrate for proper sentencing.
Example 2:
Three people are being tried together for a fraud case. During the trial, the Magistrate finds that two of them deserve stricter punishment. He forwards both those accused to the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 364 while continuing proceedings for the third, if he finds him not guilty or deserving of a lesser sentence.
BNSS Section 364 Short Information
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| Section Name | BNSS Section 364 |
| When It Applies | Applies when a Magistrate finds the punishment required is more severe than what he can legally impose. |
| Magistrate’s Duty | The Magistrate must record his opinion in writing and forward the case, along with the accused, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM). |
| Role of Chief Judicial Magistrate | The CJM can review the case, call for evidence again if necessary, and deliver an appropriate judgment or sentence. |
| Purpose | Ensures fair and proportionate punishment by transferring cases that need higher authority, maintaining justice and legal discipline. |
BNSS Section 364 FAQs
BNSS 365
Conclusion
BNSS Section 364 ensures that if a Magistrate feels a case deserves stricter punishment than he can give, he must forward it to the Chief Judicial Magistrate. This process ensures fair sentencing, prevents under-punishment, and keeps the judicial system balanced and just.
Need Legal Support?
If you are dealing with court cases, marriage problems, or any other legal issue, our team at Marriage Solution – Lawyer Help is here for you. Simply fill out our quick online enquiry form, and we’ll connect you with the right legal expert to support your needs .