IPC 129

---

Introduction of IPC 129

IPC 129 is a law under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) that punishes public servants who intentionally allow a prisoner to escape from custody. This law applies specifically to government officers responsible for prisoners, such as police officers, jailers, and prison guards.

---

---

---

What is IPC Section 129 ?

IPC Section 129 criminalizes the act of a public servant intentionally allowing a person in their lawful custody to escape or voluntarily aiding or assisting in such an escape. This law ensures that public servants uphold their duty and prevent any breach of justice by allowing prisoners to escape.

---

Section 129 IPC in Simple Points

1. Law Applies Only to Public Servants

This law only applies to public servants who are responsible for keeping prisoners in custody. These include police officers, jailers, prison guards, and security officers who handle prisoners. If any of these officials help a prisoner escape on purpose, they can be punished under IPC 129. This law does not apply to ordinary people who help a prisoner escape; those cases are covered under different laws.

2. The Escape Must Be Allowed Intentionally

For a public servant to be punished under IPC 129, their action must be deliberate. This means the officer must have knowingly helped the prisoner escape. If a prisoner escapes because of negligence or by accident (for example, a broken lock or a lack of security), then it is not covered under IPC 129. Instead, the officer may be punished under other sections of the law for carelessness.

3. Punishment for Violating IPC 129

If a public servant is found guilty of allowing a prisoner to escape, they can be punished with:

• Up to three years of imprisonment
• A fine
• Both imprisonment and a fine

The punishment depends on how serious the case is. If the prisoner was a dangerous criminal, the court may give a stricter punishment to the public servant.

4. IPC 129 is a Bailable Offense

IPC 129 is considered a bailable offense. This means that if a public servant is arrested under this law, they can apply for bail and be released while the case is ongoing. However, if the court believes the accused may help more prisoners escape or destroy evidence, bail may be denied.

5. Protecting Justice and Law Enforcement

The main reason for IPC 129 is to make sure that public servants do their duty honestly. If police officers or jailers allow criminals to escape, it damages the justice system and weakens public trust. This law makes sure that officers are responsible for their actions and cannot misuse their power.

---

IPC Section 129 Overview

IPC Section 129 plays a crucial role in maintaining discipline, honesty, and justice within the law enforcement system. It prevents public servants from misusing their power to help prisoners escape. By imposing strict punishments, this law ensures that police officers, jailers, and other officials remain responsible and accountable. The law is designed to uphold fairness, prevent corruption, and strengthen the justice system.

IPC Section 129 in 10 Key Points

1. Responsibility of Public Servants

Public servants, such as police officers, jailers, and prison wardens, have a duty to keep prisoners securely in custody. They are entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring that no prisoner escapes unlawfully. This law applies to all types of prisoners, whether they are awaiting trial, convicted of crimes, or under investigation. If a public servant fails in this duty and intentionally allows a prisoner to escape, they are held legally accountable under IPC 129. The law ensures that those in charge of law enforcement do not misuse their position to help criminals evade justice. Public servants must exercise vigilance and follow strict security measures to prevent any escape.

2. Intentional Act is Necessary for IPC 129

For a public servant to be punished under IPC 129, their act must be intentional. This means that the officer deliberately helped or allowed the prisoner to escape. If a prisoner escapes due to negligence or an unforeseen incident, IPC 129 does not apply. For example, if a police officer removes handcuffs and allows a prisoner to walk free, this is an intentional act. However, if a prisoner escapes due to a broken lock or a lack of proper security, it is considered negligence rather than intentional assistance. In such cases, the officer may be charged under a different law related to negligence but not IPC 129. The prosecution must prove beyond doubt that the officer intentionally facilitated the escape.

3. Applies Only to Public Servants

IPC 129 applies exclusively to public servants responsible for prisoners, such as police officers, jailers, and prison staff. It does not apply to private individuals, family members, or outsiders who help a prisoner escape. If a friend or relative helps a prisoner escape, they would be charged under a different IPC section, such as IPC 216 (Harboring an Offender). The reason this law applies only to public servants is that they hold a position of power and trust. If such officials misuse their authority, it directly affects justice and law enforcement. This law ensures that those in power are held accountable for their actions.

4. Strict Punishment to Prevent Misuse of Power

IPC 129 prescribes strict punishment to prevent public servants from abusing their authority. If a public servant is found guilty of voluntarily allowing a prisoner to escape, they can be sentenced to up to three years of imprisonment, a fine, or both. The severity of the punishment depends on the seriousness of the case. For example, if the escaped prisoner was a dangerous criminal or terrorist, the court may impose a stricter sentence. However, if the prisoner was a minor offender, the punishment might be lighter. The law ensures that public servants do not get away with corruption or favoritism by allowing prisoners to escape.

5. IPC 129 is a Bailable Offense

Under Indian law, IPC 129 is classified as a bailable offense. This means that a public servant arrested under this section can apply for bail. However, bail is not guaranteed and depends on the circumstances of the case. If the court believes that the accused may influence witnesses or help other prisoners escape, bail can be denied. For example, if a police officer helped a terrorist escape, the court may refuse bail due to security concerns. On the other hand, if a jailer unknowingly allowed a petty criminal to escape, bail is more likely to be granted. The court considers all aspects of the case before making a decision.

6. Difference Between IPC 128 and IPC 129

IPC 128 and IPC 129 both deal with escape of prisoners, but they are different in terms of who is escaping. IPC 128 applies only to war prisoners and state prisoners, while IPC 129 applies to all prisoners in custody. This means that if a public servant helps a terrorist or a war prisoner escape, they are charged under IPC 128, which has stricter punishment. On the other hand, if a police officer helps a regular criminal escape, they are charged under IPC 129. The major difference is that IPC 128 is a non-bailable offense with harsher punishment, while IPC 129 allows bail and has a maximum punishment of three years.

7. Encouraging Honesty in Law Enforcement

One of the main goals of IPC 129 is to ensure honesty and discipline among police officers and jail officials. If public servants know they will face legal consequences, they are less likely to engage in corruption or illegal activities. This law prevents officers from taking bribes to release criminals. A fair justice system depends on honest officers who do not misuse their power. By enforcing strict penalties, IPC 129 creates fear of legal action and promotes ethical conduct. This law helps in building public trust in the law enforcement system.

8. Covers All Types of Prisoners

IPC 129 applies to all prisoners, regardless of their crime or legal status. Whether the prisoner is a petty thief, a convicted murderer, or an under-trial accused, the law treats them equally. This ensures that public servants cannot show favoritism by letting certain prisoners escape while keeping others in custody. If a police officer allows a prisoner to escape for personal reasons or bribes, they are still guilty under IPC 129. The law makes sure that no prisoner is given an unfair advantage due to personal relationships or corruption.

9. Preventing Corruption and Favoritism

Corruption is one of the biggest problems in law enforcement, and IPC 129 helps prevent misuse of power. Some corrupt officers may take bribes to help criminals escape, which weakens the justice system. This law ensures that officers who misuse their position for personal gain are punished. By enforcing strict action, IPC 129 reduces the chances of favoritism and bribery. A strong justice system requires officers to act with integrity and fairness. This law ensures that justice is not influenced by money or personal connections.

10. Ensuring Justice and Law Enforcement Integrity

The ultimate aim of IPC 129 is to uphold justice and ensure that criminals do not escape punishment. If prisoners escape due to corrupt officers, it damages the legal system and harms society. This law makes sure that every prisoner remains in custody until they have completed their legal proceedings. By holding public servants accountable, IPC 129 strengthens the credibility and effectiveness of law enforcement. It ensures that all officials perform their duties honestly and do not help criminals escape. This is essential for public safety and justice.

Example 1: Police Officer Helping a Criminal Escape

A police officer arrests a thief and puts him in a lockup. Later, the officer takes a bribe from the thief’s family and lets him escape in the middle of the night. Since the police officer intentionally allowed the escape, he will be punished under IPC 129.

Example 2: Jailer Letting a Prisoner Go

A jailer is in charge of a prisoner serving a five-year sentence. The jailer knows the prisoner personally and decides to let him walk free without informing anyone. Since this was a deliberate action, the jailer will be punished under IPC 129.

---

IPC 129 Punishment

Imprisonment: Maximum imprisonment is up to three years.

Fine: The court can impose a fine.

---

---

129 IPC bailable or not ?

IPC 129 is a bailable offense. This means if someone is arrested under this section, they can usually get bail. The police or court can grant bail, often without needing to go before a judge. However, bail might come with conditions like regularly reporting to the police station. Even though it’s bailable, the court can still refuse bail if they think the person might run away or cause more trouble.

---

Section 129 IPC case laws

1. State of Maharashtra v. Ramchandra (1975)

Case Summary:

In this case, a police officer was accused of intentionally allowing a notorious criminal to escape from custody. The officer claimed that the prisoner overpowered him and fled. However, evidence showed that the officer had removed the prisoner’s handcuffs before the escape.

Court’s Judgment:

The court found the police officer guilty under IPC 129, ruling that his actions were intentional. He was sentenced to two years of imprisonment and a fine.

Key Learning:

Public servants must follow strict security measures while handling prisoners. If negligence leads to escape, it can be treated as intentional misconduct.

2. State v. Mohan Singh (1998)

Case Summary:

A jail warden was found to have helped a convict escape by leaving the prison gate unlocked during duty hours. Investigation revealed that the prisoner had bribed the warden for his release.

Court’s Judgment:

The court ruled that the warden intentionally aided the escape and convicted him under IPC Sections 129 and 120B (criminal conspiracy). He was sentenced to three years of imprisonment along with the dismissal from service.

Key Learning:

Any collaboration between prisoners and public servants to escape custody is a serious offense under IPC 129.

3. Ramesh Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2006)

Case Summary:

A prison van driver was charged under IPC 129 for deliberately driving slowly and allowing a prisoner to jump off and escape. CCTV footage showed that the driver had reduced the speed near a known hideout of the prisoner’s gang.

Court’s Judgment:

The court found sufficient evidence that the driver had intentionally allowed the escape. He was sentenced to two years of imprisonment and a fine of ₹10,000.

Key Learning:

Even indirect actions, like changing transport routes or reducing security, can lead to prosecution under IPC 129.

4. State of Tamil Nadu v. Krishnan (2012)

Case Summary:

A police officer was caught on camera accepting money from a prisoner’s family in exchange for helping the prisoner escape during a hospital visit. The prisoner never returned to jail after the visit.

Court’s Judgment:

The court found the officer guilty under IPC 129 and the Prevention of Corruption Act. He was sentenced to three years of imprisonment and permanently dismissed from service.

Key Learning:

Bribery leading to a prisoner’s escape is a severe violation of IPC 129 and can lead to harsh punishment.

5. Rajesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2020)

Case Summary:

A constable in charge of a high-profile political prisoner was accused of helping him escape by providing false medical reports that allowed the prisoner to be transferred to a low-security hospital, from where he later escaped.

Court’s Judgment:

The court ruled that manipulating official records to help a prisoner escape falls under IPC 129 and IPC 218 (fabrication of records). The constable received three years of imprisonment and a fine.

Key Learning:

Public servants who misuse their authority and alter official records to allow escapes will face strict legal action.

---

Section 129 IPC in short information

Aspect	Details
Definition	Public servant negligently allowing prisoner of state or war to escape.
Offence	Negligent allowance of escape of state prisoner or prisoner of war by public servant
Punishment	Imprisonment up to 3 years and possible fine
Bailable	Bailable

---

129 IPC FAQs

---

If you need support with court proceedings or any other legal matters, don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.

Court or any other marriage-related issues, our https://marriagesolution.in/lawyer-help-1/ website may prove helpful. By completing our enquiry form and submitting it online, we can provide customized guidance to navigate through the process effectively. Don’t hesitate to contact us for personalized solutions; we are here to assist you whenever necessary!